FLASH
Shkruar nga Auron Tare
Heritage experts point out that a new, modern look for this iconic building would damage the historical context, stripping it of its identity and heritage value.
Today, at 10:00 local time in the American capital, Washington DC, the trial begins for one of the most interesting cases in the field of American cultural heritage.
25 of the most renowned experts in the field of American Cultural Heritage, represented by the legal firm Cultural Heritage Partners, have filed a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump, who intends to paint the iconic Eisenhower Executive Office Building in the Capital.
This historic building, which is considered part of the White House complex, was built about 150 years ago.
It once housed the administration of the American Admiralty, the Department of Defense and War, and has served in a series of different functions for all American Presidents since its construction. It was precisely in this Building that the Japanese ambassador declared war on America in Secretary Cordell's office. Considered an iconic Building in its brilliance, it was criticized by many personalities of the time, including the writer Mark Twain. However, time has made the Building bear the weight of its history as part of the history of the American state.
Meanwhile, today at 10:00, the lawsuit against the President demands the immediate halt to plans to paint the building, which has remained in its original form since construction.
President Trump's plan calls for painting it white to give the building a new, modern image.
But heritage specialists, who oppose this plan, argue that painting the Historic Building would:
1. Permanently and irreversibly damaged granite, stucco, tiles, and decorative stone elements;
2. It would violate the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which apply to federal actions affecting historic properties;
3. It would create a large and ongoing financial burden on taxpayers, as if the building were painted, restoring it to its original condition would require frequent and extremely costly interventions.
Also, heritage experts emphasize that a new, modern look for this iconic building would damage the historical context, stripping it of its identity and heritage value.
The Battle over Historical Heritage opens today, and in the coming days we will watch its development with great interest to understand whether the debate over the preservation of architecture and historical heritage are issues worth suing even the President of America.
Lini një Përgjigje