TAGS-AT E JAVËS

Forum2025-03-30 07:08:00

Baton's disgusting services to every prime minister!

Shkruar nga Arben Malaj

Baton's disgusting services to every prime minister!

As for Batoni's humble question that no one can do what Berisha, Meta and now Rama did, this is a ridiculous conclusion that is usually made in any case only by those who "sell themselves" not at an easy price for small, abusive financial gains...

How right Einstein was when he said: "The world is not bad because there are bad people, but because good people do nothing against them/the Batons". The disgusting services for every Baton prime minister, is not that he is an analyst of the good history of governments and principles of leadership. Baton is a servant of the "Pizza Taxi" format. They call him, "bring us a pizza/humble writing" and he runs. Baton, for the influenced payment alone, receives 17,000 euros per month as a consultant in a private hospital, together with social and health insurance, Baton costs the hospital/the sick about 22,000 euros per month or about 250,000 euros per year.

In 5 years they make about 1.2 million euros and in 10 years about 2.5 million euros. But the eternal "leader-lover" Batons, who receive such large salaries in various forms, have increased significantly.

Consulting costs are passed on to the hospital's costs and from there, along with the hospital's profits, they are charged to the sick at high prices.

This is how much abuse is being inflicted on poor Albanian patients for media gain.

According to the media, Batoni is suspected of illegal interference in favor of Kosovo companies at Albanian customs or even money laundering for fictitious sales and purchases of villas.

As for Batoni's humble question that no one can do what Berisha, Meta and now Rama did, this is a ridiculous conclusion that is usually only made by those who "sell themselves" not at an easy price for small, abusive financial gains.

No matter how great Batoni sells himself for his pro-prime minister analyses made for every prime minister during our difficult transition, Batoni can never come close to the greatness of the great writer Mark Twain, who, "for the exhausting fatigue of the Batonis" to publicly justify third and fourth mandates, why not even eternal ones, according to Batoni, provides a very useful response not only to Batoni, but especially for countries with weak institutions, as Albania is unfortunately assessed in recent international reports on the level of corruption and state capture.

Mark Twain advises Batons and their bosses that: "Politicians and diapers should be changed often, and for the same reason."

The same reason is that children often become dirty unintentionally, while politicians are constantly dirty through corruption and greed.

Political history proves what Batoni does not "understand."

The longer they are in power, the more often and the more dirty politicians who are victims of absolute powers become.

Everyone, including Batons, chooses their own motive for life.

Here's how artificial intelligence clarifies this moment:

The expression "better a suffering Socrates than a satisfied pig" is attributed to the English philosopher John Stuart Mill, who used it in his book "Utilitarianism" (1863).

Origin and context: Mill was a proponent of utilitarianism, a philosophy that emphasizes maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering. He believed that happiness should be measured not only in quantity but also in quality.

In "Utilitarianism," Mill argues that some pleasures are more valuable than others. He distinguished higher pleasures, which are intellectual and moral, from lower pleasures, which are physical and sensual.

His expression serves to illustrate this distinction. He argued that human beings, with their capacity for reasoning and self-reflection, are capable of higher pleasures than animals.

Therefore, a human who experiences intellectual or moral suffering is still in a higher state than an animal who experiences only physical pleasure.

Socrates, who is mentioned in the saying, was a famous Greek philosopher who had suffered a lot in his life; he was known for his high intellectual abilities.

Interpretation:

The expression does not mean that suffering is desirable, but that intellectual and moral pleasures are more valuable than physical pleasures.

It emphasizes the importance of intellectual and moral development, even if it leads to suffering.

It also suggests that human beings have a higher nature than animals and that we should strive to realize our unique potential.

Essentially, the expression is an argument for the value of intellect and morality over mere physical pleasures. Everyone chooses their own motive for life. The expression "better a Socrates unhappy than a pig content" is attributed to the English philosopher John Stuart Mill, who used it in his book "Utilitarianism" (1863).

Origin and context:

Mill was a proponent of utilitarianism, a philosophy that emphasizes maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering. He believed that happiness should be measured not only in quantity but also in quality.

In "Utilitarianism," Mill argues that some pleasures are more valuable than others. He distinguished higher pleasures, which are intellectual and moral, from lower pleasures, which are physical and sensual.

His expression serves to illustrate this distinction. He argued that human beings, with their capacity for reasoning and self-reflection, are capable of higher pleasures than animals. Therefore, a human who experiences intellectual or moral suffering is still in a higher state than an animal who experiences only physical pleasure.

Socrates, who is mentioned in the saying, was a famous Greek philosopher who had suffered a lot in his life; he was known for his high intellectual abilities.

Interpretation:

The expression does not mean that suffering is desirable, but that intellectual and moral pleasures are more valuable than physical pleasures.

It emphasizes the importance of intellectual and moral development, even if it leads to suffering.

It also suggests that human beings have a higher nature than animals and that we should strive to realize our unique potential.

Essentially, the expression is an argument for the value of intellect and morality over mere physical pleasures.

*The article was based on an opinion piece by journalist Baton Haxhiu

Lini një Përgjigje