FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Even though he has an income of millions of euros, the SP deputy has gone so far as to take 30 million old ALL from the state budget...
The Assembly has decided to convene a meeting of the Council for the Regulation of Mandates and Immunity on September 4, to decide on the fate of the socialist MP Vullnet Sinaj. The latter is accused by the opposition of having benefited from the state budget through his companies. Such a thing has been stopped and we are under conditions of conflict of interest. For this reason, DP has demanded that his mandate as deputy be removed.
But what is it really about? In the motion signed by 14 opposition MPs, it is evidenced through 30 accompanying evidences, that MP Sinai exercises his mandate in violation of point 3 of Article 70 of the Constitution, which prohibits the MP from receiving funds from the State Budget or state property.
From the verification of the data of the General Directorate of the Treasury and the National Business Center, it results that the deputy in question, through the companies owned by him, has benefited from income from the State Budget. The companies 'BIGALB GROUP' sh.pk, 'BIG LISUS' sh.pk, 'BIG DURRSI' sh.pk, 'BIG PESHKOPIA' sh.pk, 'BIG ROI' sh.pk, 'BIG LEO' sh.pk, ' BIG LEZHA' sh.pk, 'BIG DRINI' sh.pk, 'BASHKIMI' sh.pk, 'TIRANA CASH & CARRY' sh.pk, which are owned or co-owned by deputy Vullnet Sinaj, through only 9 verified transactions, have benefited from income from the State Budget in the total amount of ALL 3,689,814.
" The above companies have continued to be owned by the deputy Vullnet Sinaj even after he won the mandate of the deputy and also after he appointed two people Mrs. Elona Koshi and Mr. Eduart Koshi as a trusted person of the sole partner Mr. Vullnet Sinaj', through act-agreements dated 20.07.2017, 29.03.2018 and 31.10.2018. Through these agreements, it results that only the transfer of quotas was done and not their alienation, going from 'active owner of shares' to 'passive owner of shares' due to the appointment of 'a trusted person' ", DP emphasizes.
According to PD, the 'trusted person', as clearly defined in the aforementioned Act-agreements, only has the right to make decisions over 100% of the quotas owned by deputy Vullnet Sinaj, for the purpose of general management of the companies' activity. But in no case, deputy Vullnet Sinaj does not lose the right to receive profits from society.
" Mr. Vullnet Sinaj, despite becoming a passive owner of his shares, enjoys individually the right to benefit from the civil fruits of ownership that he enjoys over his shares in the company, benefits which will be reflected in detail in the Financial Statements of the company, but in any case, it cannot exercise any other civil action on this property ", it is further stated.
The Motion also highlights the fact that initially in the Act-Agreement dated 20.07.2017, deputy Sinaj expressly provided in point 8, of article 3, that: 'The company will not carry out any profitable activity that originates from the property of the state or the local government nor to acquire wealth from these, in order to correctly implement point 3 of article 70 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania'.
Furthermore, such a prohibition has been removed from the content of the Act-Agreements dated 29.03.2018 and 31.10.2018, thus allowing, contrary to the Constitution, for the companies owned by him to benefit starting from 2019, income from the State Budget and MP Sinai to receive other income, in addition to salary, from the profit of his companies from the state income.
The ownership of these companies and the fact that the profits went as dividends to the deputy Vullnet Sinaj itself is also proven by the Annual Statements of wealth declaration for the subject Vullnet Sinaj. DP announces that the declarations of the years 2017 (beginning of office), 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2022, which are public, have been analyzed, from which the deputy declares the ownership of these companies and declares the profits of these companies as income, through receiving the dividend in accordance with the shares it owns in each company.
So even though he has an income of millions of euros, the SP deputy has gone so far as to take 30 million old ALL from the state budget.
Beqaj-Kokëdhima precedents
To date, we have two precedents where mandates have been lost. The first precedent is that of Ilir Beqaj. In 2011, he was stripped of his mandate as a member of parliament, after a company run by him won the tender for equipping institutions in Durrës with computers.
While in 2016, the mandate of MP Koço Kokëdhimas was removed. The latter had benefited from public funds through his company Abissnet while he was an MP.
We also have the recent case of Olta Xhaçka, where for two years Rama has not allowed her to go to the Constituent Assembly. In the new session, it is expected that she will most likely lose her mandate. / Pamphlet
Lini një Përgjigje