TAGS-AT E JAVËS

Aktualitet2024-04-24 08:06:00

The sensational testimony of the professor of Forensic Medicine: The new facts that prove that the death of Mehmet Shehu was a murder

Shkruar nga Pamfleti

The sensational testimony of the professor of Forensic Medicine: The new facts

Bardhyl Çipi, one of the most experienced specialists in our country in the field of Forensic Medicine and Bioethics, their teaching and training of new forensic experts. Some of his patients are: the victim who was killed at the border to escape from the communist dictatorship, but helped by his faithful dog, to discover his hidden corpse, the exiled woman who killed herself out of despair, the citizens of Kosovo killed by the Serbs, because they wanted to live free, so as not to be humiliated and tortured by them, the inhabitants who lived 1500 years ago in Albania, the professor of the University of Tirana robbed and killed, etc.

A book on death and the scientific evidence for the discovery of its different types: murder, suicide, stimulated and forced by the communist regime, murder and genocide against Albanians by their neighbors, fresh or decomposed and skeletonized corpses. Death documents of prominent persons; Kennedy, Lincoln, Napoleon, Lenin, Trotsky, etc., and other events of the deaths of ordinary people.

Knowledge of the changes that occur after death and the examination of corpses in the world and in our country, from a historical, ethical, forensic, legal point of view. Some of his recent books are; "Manual of Forensic Medicine" (2015), "Bioethics in Albania nowadays" (2016), "Albanian transition under the lens of forensic medicine" (2018), "Forensic Medicine" (2020).

                                               Continues from last issue

 The scientific evidence proving that Mehmet Shehu's death was murder

From the interpretation of the above documentation, according to the forensic forensic medicine, it is immediately noticeable that their descriptions are detailed and the conclusions of the forensic and criminalistic acts are generally correct, but there are also some shortcomings.

Thus, it does not result that the measurement of the height of the gunshot wound holes, from the soles of the feet or the lower parts of the buttocks or buttocks (ischiatic tubercles);

Likewise, the laboratory and microscopic examinations to determine the complementary factors of the shooting in the tissues and soft tissues, around the entrance hole of the gunshot wound and of the dark blue dots of the thumb nail, do not appear to have been carried out. of the right hand, all of these very important, for the most scientific determination of the mechanisms of this event.

In addition to these, there are also some actions, the performance of which has not been allowed by the higher state authorities:

- The autopsy of the corpse was not done  (it was forbidden to send the corpse to the morgue, for its performance). As far as I remember from what I have learned from other forensic colleagues, at that time, the removal of the corpse from the house was only done when it was sent for burial).

However, I would like to add that in gunshot injuries, a complete and detailed external examination of the corpse is most important.

However, the autopsy would make it possible to accurately detect the canal and the tissues and organs affected by the passage of the projectile inside the body, the cause of death, with scientific accuracy, as well as the finding of any possible toxic substance that could have been used. before death.

 - In the presentation of numerous photos of this case , those of the back of the body are missing.

 - The graphic examination of the farewell letter , which the victim is thought to have left before his death, has not been carried out; she disappeared immediately before the start of the investigation of the scene.

As is known, the farewell letter is written by the person before committing suicide and left by him, usually in places that are easily discovered, as it is claimed in the case of M. Shehu, when this letter was found by his son, at the head of the bed where the corpse was located.

This letter should be carefully examined by the crime scene investigation team, in its original, in order to determine whether or not it was actually written by the hand of the suicide bomber.

For this, it must be subjected to a comparative graphic examination, in order to exclude forgery, or the intervention of a foreign hand in its compilation, as is encountered in many cases, of concealing murders.

This is even in those cases, when this letter contains reflected thoughts of the victim himself, which may have been written by the victim himself, when he was alive, but which were then manipulated by the killer.

These reservations, which question the authenticity of the farewell letter, may also have been in the supposed farewell letter of M. Shehu. Even more so, that this letter found at the scene of the event, immediately disappeared from the party bodies and appears after 21 years, from this event.

For this letter, whose existence is suspected, because it was not described at all in the minutes of the inspection of the scene, but even if there was a letter written by the victim, it should have been acted according to all the rules of the procedure code criminal, of receiving and preserving it as material evidence.

Therefore, this letter appeared after 20 or so years after the death, will not have, under these conditions, any value, from the investigative point of view, for such a violent death.

 - An investigative experiment was not conducted to reconstruct the event , the position the victim had at the time of the shooting, by determining the trajectory of the deadly bullet, from the body to the place where it was found, in the upper part of the mattress. near his head.

Le të imagjinojmë me të dhënat që kemi, sesi duhet të ketë qenë kjo trajektore dhe pozicioni i viktimës.

Kështu, në vrimat e plagës me armë zjarri, në anën e majtë të gjoksit dhe shpinës të këtij rasti, vrima e daljes, ndodhet pak më poshtë dhe më brenda (më afër vijës së mesit), kundrejt asaj të hyrjes. Kjo tregon se; kalimi i predhës në trup, ka qenë jo vetëm nga para-prapa, por dhe nga sipër – poshtë dhe nga jashtë – brenda, d.m.th., nga e majta, në të djathtë (jo nga e djathta në të majtë, sikurse është shkruar gabimisht, në aktin mjeko-ligjor).

Me këto konstatime të pasqyruara edhe në konkluzionin e aktit mjekoligjor përkatës, duke marrë parasysh që; plumbi është gjetur 23 cm. nga kreu i krevatit, në çarçafin e dyshekut të krevatit, qitja në pozicionin shtrirë në kurriz e viktimës, mbi këtë krevat, është e pamundur të realizohet, sepse me drejtim nga sipër – poshtë, në këtë pozicion, predha do të shkonte më afër mesit të krevatit dhe jo pranë pjesës së sipërme të tij, ku u gjet.

Më e mundshme do të ishte që; pozicioni i viktimës në momentin e qitjes, të ketë qenë ndenjur, afër pjesës së mesme të krevatit, me gjysmën e sipërme të trupit, në pozicion të ngritur.

Në mbështetje të idesë që ka qenë ky pozicioni i viktimës, në të cilin ajo duhet të ketë ndenjur për një farë kohe më të shkurtër ose më të gjatë pas qitjes me armë zjarri, është edhe prania e përhapur e gjakut ne trajte njollash, në pjesët e poshtme të teshave, poshtë vrimave të predhës.

Në të vërtetë ky pozicion ndenjur i viktimës në momentin e qitjes me armë zjarri, do të vërtetohej më me saktësi po të ishte kryer menjëherë, ose dhe më vonë pas ngjarjes, eksperimenti hetimor, duke përdorur një fije spangoje ose, drite lazer, të vendosur ose lëshuar sipas këndit të kësaj qitjeje dhe lartësisë së dëmtimeve, në qëndrimin ndenjur të viktimës, drejt vendit ku u gjet predha.

Regjioni ku është vrima e hyrjes së plagës me armë zjarri, në anën e majtë të sipërme të gjoksit, takohet, si në rastet e vetëvrasjeve, ashtu dhe në ato të vrasjeve. Diferencën e bën drejtimi i qitjes, apo i kalimit të predhës në trup.

Pikërisht, ky ka qenë një nga arsyet që është kryer nga ana jonë, një studim mbi rolin e drejtimit të qitjes, në dallimin e vrasjes nga vetëvrasja, i paraqitur në këtë libër.

Nga literatura përkatëse dhe përvoja e gjatë mjeko-ligjore dhe kriminalistike e vendit tonë, po kështu nga përvoja time personale, dhe studimi i mëparshëm i sapo përmendur, vetëvrasësi, synon të ketë një pozicion sa më të volitshëm dhe më të qëndrueshëm të dorës së djathtë, që mban armën me drejtimin e qitjes, nga para – prapa, horizontalisht ose, pak nga sipër dhe nga e djathta, në të majtë.

According to the forensic and criminological data of M. Shehu's death, which support the official version of suicide, the victim shot himself with the gun he was holding with his right hand, sometimes assisted by his left hand, which held the front part of his of the weapon (finding the thumbprint of the victim's left hand on the front of the weapon).

This is due to the fact that the weapon was found thrown, on the right side of the bed, the position of the hand, in that cataleptic stupor (in my opinion, without any scientific basis) and the presence of gunpowder in the thumb of the right hand (this finding unverified, even with a simple laboratory analysis), to rule out another origin, such as a writing ink stain (the night before he was found dead, the prime minister had prepared a written self-criticism, which would make the next day at the Politburo meeting, where while writing, he must have stained the nail of his right thumb with ink).

With these data, in the version of suicide, the shooting direction, according to the most favorable position, of the right hand holding the weapon (according to family members, the prime minister's right hand was dominant), should have been from the front - back and horizontally, or from above and from right to left.

But this direction has not been established in the case of Mehmet Shehu's death. It was from front to back, but not horizontally or from below, above, but from above, below and not from right to left, but from left to right.

This direction of shooting, along with other data on the victim's position, clearly indicates that this is a case of murder.

So the biggest possibility is that Mehmet Shehu's death was a murder. A more acceptable version is that the executioner was on his feet, to the left of the bed, in front and slightly above the place where Mehmet Shehu was sitting, more or less in front of him, and shot the victim with a firearm. , on the left side of the chest, with a direction of the most favorable shooting for him: from the front - back, from above - below and slightly from the left, to the right, as it resulted from the forensic and criminalistic examinations, of this event.

This analysis of the materials of this case reinforces my conviction that; the death of Mehmet Shehu; it must have been a murder and not a suicide, in accordance with other data (not allowing an autopsy to be performed, not being involved in the investigation of the scene, of any farewell letter, to reappear after 21 years , etc.) as well as the expressed opinion of the Minister of Health, when he just examined the corpse, as well as the opinion after many years, in favor of homicide, from the doctor who had directed the forensic examination of the prime minister's corpse, obtained indirectly from a reliable witness./ Memorie.al

Lini një Përgjigje