
Analyst Arjan Curri declares that he is only responsible for what he says, although Behxhet Pacolli's advisor, Jetlir Zyberaj, has accused him of defamation.
He said that because of his position in Kosovo, Pacolli is not immune to criticism.
Curri emphasized once again that when he made the statements about the sexual orientation of Naim Murseli, he did not mean the former president for the other party.
Among other things, Curri expressed that he suspects that Pacolli did not participate in the funeral because of the information he had about the conflicts that Liridona Ademaj and Naim Murseli had.
Arjan Curri: Jetliri is saying that I have slandered. I'm saying it once again, because I want to say that these can be used as evidence tomorrow in court. First, clues are not defamation, even if I had mentioned names, even though I didn't. Second, I can't be held responsible for what the network fantasizes about, my responsibility is for what I say. Thirdly, the only criticism that has been made in the name of Mr. Pacolli's address is why Mr. Pacolli does not attend the funeral. There is an intervention from Jetlir who says he is in China for a business trip. I also say in which meeting it was the first or the second, because there is a distance of five days. In my view, Mr. Pacolli is not outside the radar of criticism, he is a former president, deputy, senior politician, businessman, he will definitely be subject to media criticism. One cannot complain why this one says so.
Jetlir Zyberaj: No to the exposure of Arjan's slander, definitely yes to criticism.
Arjan Curri: Yes, it is slander, it was not at the funeral.
Arjan Curri: Hypothesis is not defamation. Now you definitely want me to say that I had it for Pacolli. I didn't have it for Pacolli. I also know who it is.
Jetlir Zyberaj: You know, I don't know. Say it.
Arjan Curri: The very last one. I tell you that I have a doubt why Pacolli does not go to the funeral. We have had information from our colleagues that Mr. Pacolli, due to the closeness he had with Liridona, is the godfather of her child, he could know the reason for the conflict between them and chose at that moment not to be part of this conflict, that is, to do not enter the scene. I still think he knows the reason why the two of them were in conflict.
Lini një Përgjigje