FLASH
Shkruar nga Ylli PataProblematic in participation, problematic in organization, problematic in the message conveyed to the public, they have only brought a rhetoric that has now been repeated, where the parties on the panels fight over participation numbers.
No one understands why the DP called a protest a show where a few people talk, in front of an installed panel that costs a fortune.
Protest, as the term itself indicates, is a human and communicative demonstration for a specific issue or cause, when even if there are few people, it makes news with the human reaction.
A reaction that, through media communication, creates a certain sensitivity to the issue being heated, but also to the group that takes it on.
Meanwhile, oppositions around the world also protest, for a cause that they bring up in Parliament or the media, to create a demonstration of the popular support they represent.
A few days ago, massive protests took place in German cities to show their protest against an institutional party such as the CDU of Konrad Adenauer, Helmut Kohl, and Angela Merkel, which has become closer to the far-right AfD.
But even though the protests were strong and massive, as German media reports show, the CDU did not suffer any decline in the polls, just weeks before the elections.
However, even though it did not achieve the objective of hitting the opponent on target, the protests managed to mobilize the people of the left, to avoid suffering the powerful avalanche of votes against that is expected to occur. Where abstention, that is, not going to the elections, is the biggest fear of traditional voters.
Meanwhile, if we return to the DP's demonstrations in front of the prime minister's office in the past or even today, they have not had any political consequences of their own.
Problematic in participation, problematic in organization, problematic in the message conveyed to the public, they have only brought a rhetoric that has now been repeated, where the parties on the panels fight over participation numbers.
Where more than political reporting or analysis, there are reports from news reporters about possible arrests or injuries from pyrotechnic devices.
Even today, the discussion that is happening after the "protest" is over is its pre-technical effect. After the capsules were thrown on the steps of the prime minister's office.
An effect that is added to the loud noise of pyrotechnic devices in the live television broadcast.
And precisely the noise is the so-called political consequence, or rather the code it transmits to the public.
A code that is addressed to voters or supporters who are decreasing every day of Berisha's party, to let them know that there is no other alternative for them. Since with words, both Berisha and the others in the leadership do not dare to communicate the truth, as they embellish it by talking about victory, removal of nn grata and the closure of SPAK, they use the language of capsule noises.
And most likely, in the next measurement expected to take place at the end of this month, the numbers may either increase by 1-2% of voters returning to Berisha, or they will remain in the same place. A familiar language of elections now, where as the elections approach, there is also a mobilization of upset supporters. But which in reality only serves Berisha to stay on stage, with a repeated parody of the capsules.
Lini një Përgjigje