FLASH
Shkruar nga Flamur Vezaj
This is more like an internal conflict over file control.
Duman's email is made of titanium, the others are made of plasticine! SPAK is "hacked" with one click and then becomes a hero with a delay.
On March 12, 2025, someone shared on WhatsApp some materials obtained from the emails of several SPAK prosecutors. Not from the internal IT system – no, no – just from the emails. And SPAK, for a whole month, did not say a word. Total silence. Like an institution that, as soon as the ink runs out, takes a deep breath, waits for the wave to pass and pretends nothing happened.
But when he finally spoke – on April 4 – he did it with style: “The system has not been affected, only the emails have been attacked.” As if emails are not part of the system! As if files do not circulate through them! And even funnier: they tried to access Altin Dumani’s email, but “without success”. What a surprise! Other people’s emails fall like rotten tomatoes, but Dumani’s is made of titanium. Presidential protection.
Meanwhile, sensitive information – suspected to be related to investigations into Gjiknuri, the Ahmetaj file, people who have filed with the Constitutional Court because their personal data has been exposed – has been released. Question: who distributed it? Who copied it? Who ordered it?
What does SPAK do? It catches two individuals: one who did the phishing (it is said), and another who distributed them. And that closes the circle. That's it? Two guys with a laptop and suddenly we have a "structured criminal group"? What about the financiers? The order givers? The beneficiaries of the materials?
This looks more like an internal clash over file control. A system that is tearing its own eyes out. Prosecutors are divided into a classic Balkan scheme: mother and stepmother. One protects himself with an email bunker, the others click a link and leave the institution without underwear.
The biggest irony? Instead of SPAK investigating the real source of the leak, it signs orders for journalists. Because, of course, the problem is not the leak of information, but the fact that the public found out. Today, the journalist must notify the prosecutor before publishing. We have entered the time when censorship is called “coordination.”
We all know it's not the first time:
• Civil status data – 2008
• License plates, licenses, salaries, patronage agents, TIMS
• Iranian hackers who became more informed than SHISH
• And always: no one is held responsible
For every scandal, always the same scheme: a press release, a conference, a noisy arrest and then – silence. Who was convicted for the patronage? Who for the attacks on TIMS? Why is the victim always journalism and those who publish, but never those who leak the information?
Our systems are more perforated than the roof of the National Theater before the demolition.
And yet, every time there is a leak, a statement is released. Two people are arrested in the same style as in the old police chronicles: "the perpetrator was without precedent and cooperated with justice." The file is closed with the excuse "the system was not affected."
How come you didn't get tired of treating us like fools?
We are dealing with an internal war for information. Anyone with eyes and ears understands that this data does not come out by "fishing". It comes out because there are people inside who have an interest in burning opponents. We are not in 1997. These blackmails with "release the email publicly" are more a struggle for power within the justice system than an attack on the institution.
But worse than SPAK are the journalists' associations. Instead of protecting freedom of speech and the work of honest journalists (not blackmailers), they are silent! Journalism cannot be an extension of the prosecution. If it has helped uncover the truth, bravo to it. Not an investigation, but recognition it deserves. No one should ask SPAK for permission to publish.
Then, why did it take SPAK a month to react? Why does the reaction come only after the information has been made public? Why is the file kept under investigation by the prosecutor who has the file and not passed on to another prosecutor's office, as is normal practice in any modern justice system due to conflict of interest!?
Because the problem isn't the hacker. The problem is the fear of transparency.
SPAK has long ceased to function as an independent structure, but as a gladiator arena with emails and statements. Now even email has become a tool of war. And while we deal with the "small fish", the sharks move freely among the files, emails and tenders... which they distribute themselves, but then look for the enemy!
Lini një Përgjigje