FLASH
Shkruar nga Mero Baze
They are completely different in both layout format and content.
The leaked decision of the Court of Appeals to keep Erion Veliaj in prison is a new refutation of SPAK's propaganda on the day of the trial and after it.
All the news infiltrated by SPAK into the media, including that of its official "traders", spoke of new evidence emerging from cell phone intercepts, which seriously implicated Erion Veliaj.
A copy of this "evidence" is even being published on a portal that presents itself as an official SPAK body.
Although the debate over who leaked the wiretaps became annoying, today I saw the copy that the lawyers received and the copy that was published in the press.
They are completely different in both layout format and content.
In the copy published in print, there is the speech of Prosecutor Olsi Dado given in Court, formulated as a speech where the arguments are illustrated with snippets of wiretaps inserted as "evidence".
In the copy that the lawyers have, there is neither a speech nor a presentation of evidence, but simply a table of wiretaps, with squares - from such and such an hour to such and such an hour, this phone number with this phone number - as is the official format of wiretaps.
In order not to violate the law, I am illustrating this with an official wiretap format used by the prosecution.
This is the format of the wiretaps that the lawyers received.
What SPAK has published in their "official body" is not the lawyers' copy, but the copy prepared by prosecutor Olsi Dado himself.
This sealed copy is in the form of a speech given by the prosecutor before the court and is illustrated with wiretaps.
This is not the lawyers' copy, although from within SPAK they tried to create a diversion among the lawyers as to who might have produced it.
Now, whether this is a violation of the law or not is a debate that should be handled by SPAK, since we have assigned it to assess legal violations.
But that SPAK has made public propaganda by lynching a prisoner and also fueling the fantasy of Albanian perverts about the prisoner's family relationships is a public fact.
I don't know why the prosecutor suffers from wife-betrayal syndrome, but including wiretaps about private life in a prosecutor's report and then making them public is simply lynching against the prisoner - who I hope will take this legal battle to the end in Strasbourg, in order to create a standard of punishment for those who want to impose Iranian laws on the lives of those who wiretap in Albania.
The judge's reasoning is related to Veliaj's position as mayor and the possibility of his escape, as according to the court he has financial means.
I don't want to interpret the court's decision - for this, the lawyers will pursue the legal path of appeal - but the manipulation of public opinion with the famous "wiretapping" is simply ordinary SPAK propaganda and a great damage to its reputation.
Because it seems that personal grudges have overcome their professionalism and, even worse, they have displayed in some cases a kind of public perversity that shames them as an institution.
If you wiretap a prisoner for 24 hours, of course you will hear family, sexual, and even banal conversations.
But they are not the subject of investigation.
And they have no right – neither moral nor legal – to read them, let alone make them public.
The fact that the prosecutors in the Veliaj case tried to make propaganda with facts that the court did not take into account shows that they are unsure of their decision and are now retaliating, seeking "new facts" at all costs along the way, intimidating witnesses and inventing fables, to keep a case of high public, political and professional sensitivity afloat.
So far, they have lost the battle with facts and won the battle with propaganda.
Lini një Përgjigje