FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Iliri and Monika are two communication vessels with the same subject, which is money, corruption, unjustified villas, beautyline, schools in London, the black block, suspicions of murdering witnesses in crime, villas with 9 bathrooms for cats, lobbing in America with money from dirty channels, and finally the stupidity and stupidity that has exploded on both of them...
My friend in charge of the newspaper's editorial office has been asking me for an interview for several days. I told him that 'I am a journalist myself and I am not going to answer in an interview', he nevertheless insisted. Finally he sent me the questions. The first question: "Ilir Meta, why even after he reformed, he was still expelled from PL?" I saw that I had nothing to answer. To enter the allishveres of Monika of Iliri? After all these words of theirs, it already feels like pollution to keep dealing with their names and deeds... I felt bad. What do I need, how they renew each other, then throw it away, and then cut it... Well, we in the media, what will the readers do tomorrow? I started to panic. Iliri and Monika, are two communication vessels with the same subject, which is money, corruption, unjustified villas, beautyline, schools in London, the black block, suspicions of murdering witnesses in crime, villas with 9 bathrooms for cats, lobbing in America with money from dirty channels, and finally the stupidity and stupidity that has exploded on both of them...
And what can be written in an interview about these two people who are not even worth us, they are only worth the investigation of the crime. And every media reader, from the shepherd to the judge, already knows better than anyone. Meta, Monika, Saliu, Liria..., are the ones who are expected to pay for the crimes committed... But how cool is it for the media to gnaw their teeth at only these! Vanity. How to answer
The next question: what do you think about Ilir Meta's situation?
Wow! Do I start thinking about Ilir Meta? Or anyone else, even a simple reader. What did man have to think about the president of the Republic, he thought, swallowed him, analyzed him, disgusted him, cursed him, defamed him, abandoned him... That's how much man is burdened here with the deeds and appearances of these people, I'm surprised how the media - here and there. If he can testify about Meta's condition, that's what Meta is doing. On pillars, under cats, with brandy, with ugliness in conferences, with banal songs, with threats to SPAk... Endlessly messed up. But where is there a director, our journalist, who makes this film better than Ilir Meta. Let the author himself testify to this disaster.
Question three: Is he afraid of SPAK? Does he attack SPAK out of fear?
I don't know what to say. The "turjela" has entered our journalism illegally and asks him to read the other person's mind and say that "this is what he has in mind". Who knows, maybe Meta is even happy when he attacks SPAK. With the disorders he has suffered and manifests, he can even be happy to go to prison. Now he lives in a luxury hotel on Dry Lake, but tomorrow the cell itself may seem like a hotel. Then, how can I answer Like the majority of people, who curse, kill, and rage out of fear - this can apply to Ilir Meta as well. But he must be asked. I think that the Justice has collected the accounts, one is being kept on the eighth floor, the other is being kept with the whole woman hanging in fear. They are in the eyes of the whole world, nothing is left undiscovered, neither fear nor stupidity... What more can you say?
How much space we are giving them!
Lini një Përgjigje