FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Due to the shortened trial, Frrokaj will only serve 1 year and 4 months in prison.
GJKKO has sentenced to 2 years in prison the former mayor of Lezhë Municipality, Fran Frrokaj, who is accused of embezzlement and alienation of property.
Due to the shortened trial, Frrokaj will only serve 1 year and 4 months in prison. Also, Frrokaja has been deprived of the right to exercise public functions for a period of 5 years.
For this case, Sokol Toma was also sentenced to (1 year in prison), Gjovalin Marku and Adiona Martini each received 1 year in prison, but they were released on bail. While for the other two officials, Bledar Cara and Juxhina Mema, the suspension of the trial was requested, as they were sentenced earlier with a final decision on this issue.
He and 5 other former officials of the Municipality of Lezha are accused of alienating 234 thousand meters of land on the coast of Rana i Hedhun in Shengjin.
Investigations into the alienation of properties in the area of Rana i Hedhun in Shengjin started in 2017, when the prosecutor denounced the alienation of 234,548 square meters of state land in Rana.
Announcement of GJKKO:
1. The Special Prosecutor's Office against Corruption and Organized Crime on 15.10.2022 submitted to the Court the request with the object: Sending for trial the criminal case against the defendants Fran Frrokaj, Sokol Toma, Bledar Cara, Gjovalin Marku, Adiona Martini, Juxhina Mema accused of the criminal offense "Abuse of duty", provided by article 248 of the Criminal Code.
2. The trial of this case took place with the rules of summary trial. At the end of the trial, the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime with a panel composed of judges Erjon Bani, Erjon Çela and Flojera Davidhi, with decision No. 13, dated 01.03.2024 decided:
1. The guilty declaration of the defendant Fran Frrokaj, for committing the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" provided for by Article 248 of the Criminal Code and, based on this provision, his sentence of 2 (two) years of imprisonment.
¾ In application of Article 406/1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1/3 is deducted from the above measure of punishment, finally sentencing the defendant Fran Frrokaj to 1 (one) year and 4 (four) years of imprisonment.
¾ The serving of the sentence for the defendant Fran Frrokaj will start from the day this decision becomes final and will be carried out in an IEVP, ordinary security prison.
¾ Pursuant to Article 35 of the Penal Code, the removal of the right for the defendant Fran Frrokaj to exercise public functions for a period of 5 years.
2. The guilty plea of the defendant Sokol Toma, for committing the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" provided for by Article 248 of the Criminal Code and, based on this provision, his sentence of 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months of imprisonment .
¾ In application of Article 406/1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1/3 is deducted from the above measure of punishment and the defendant Sokol Toma is finally sentenced to 1 (one) year of imprisonment.
¾ In application of Article 59 of the Penal Code, it is ordered to suspend the execution of the prison sentence by placing the defendant Sokol Toma on probation for a period of 2 (two) years, provided that during this time he does not commit an offense other criminal as well as maintain regular contact with the Probation Service Office where he resides.
¾ Pursuant to Article 35 of the Penal Code, the removal of the right for the defendant Sokol Toma to exercise public functions for a period of 5 years.
3. Termination of the trial of the criminal case in charge of the defendant Bledar Cara, accused of committing the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" provided for by Article 248 of the Criminal Code, as pursuant to Articles 387/1 and 328/1/ of the K.Pr. Penale, it results that with a final decision the defendant was previously tried for the same criminal offense.
4. The guilty declaration of the defendant Gjovalin Marku, for the commission of the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" provided by article 248 of the Criminal Code and based on this provision his sentence of 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months of imprisonment .
¾ In application of Article 406/1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1/3 is deducted from the above measure of punishment, and the defendant Gjovalin Marku is finally sentenced to 1 (one) year of imprisonment.
¾ In application of Article 59 of the Penal Code, it is ordered to suspend the execution of the prison sentence by placing the defendant Gjovalin Marku on probation for a period of 2 (two) years, provided that during this time he does not commit an offense other criminal as well as maintain regular contact with the Probation Service Office where he resides.
¾ Pursuant to Article 35 of the Penal Code, the removal of the right for the defendant Gjovalin Marku to exercise public functions for a period of 5 years.
5. The guilty declaration of the defendant Adiona Martini, for committing the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" provided by Article 248 of the Criminal Code and based on this provision his sentence of 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months of imprisonment .
¾ In application of Article 406/1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1/3 is deducted from the above measure of punishment, and the defendant Adiona Martini is finally sentenced to 1 (one) year of imprisonment.
¾ In application of Article 59 of the Penal Code, it is ordered to suspend the execution of the prison sentence by placing the defendant Adiona Martini on probation for a period of 2 (two) years, provided that during this time she does not commit an offense other criminal as well as maintain regular contact with the Office of the Probation Service where it resides.
¾ Pursuant to Article 35 of the Penal Code, the removal of the right for the defendant Adiona Martini to exercise public functions for a period of 5 years.
6. Termination of the trial of the criminal case against the defendant Juxhina Mema, accused of committing the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" provided for by Article 248 of the Criminal Code, as pursuant to Articles 387/1 and 328/1/ of the K.Pr. Penale, it results that with a final decision the defendant was previously tried for the same criminal offense.
Lini një Përgjigje