
Lawyer Romeo Kara considers the testimony given by journalist Fatos Mahmutaj regarding the investigation of the "CEZ-DIA" file as a very important phase of the investigation, as there are undeniable facts.
From the studio of MCN Live, he mentioned a decision of ERE of December 2013, which harms the Albanian state by reducing the price of energy.
" With Mahmutaj's testimony, the lawyer talks about the connection of the evidence that constitutes the criminal offense.
With this decision, the Albanian state was forced to provide much cheaper energy, creating a 35 million euro per year advantage, while CEZ was run by Czech management.
If this fact has also been accepted by Ilir Meta, it has appeared in SPAK, now we are at the moment when the links of the evidence and other facts that constitute the criminal offense are made, the interview that Mahmutaj took to Mr. Ismailaj's wife in February 2016 in Vienna. The day before Meta became President and the day after, the topic of the day was Meta. I spoke on the phone with Fatos and he made me aware of this interview. He brought me bleached parts and convinced me that he gave him the entire connecting part, he created the logic of the event with what Vojsava Ismailaj had stated with what I knew. I wrote a satirical article the day after Meta's election saying that 'You are not my President'. In continuation of the conversations with Fatos, he read the entire 12 pages of the interview to me ," he said.
Kara has indicated that on the basis of this interview she filed a criminal complaint with SPAK. According to him, after the report he traveled with the whole family to Brussels.
" I heard it, I put it on YouTube, with a long password, I removed the letter so I couldn't delete it. Then I came to Tirana and took it as additional evidence, November-December 2017. It is not only this evidence, the reason why Ismailaj received this contract is strange, and it was approached through ambassador Tepshi, who is close to Meta and Berisha.
What was taken by the decision of ERE, I found proven when pressure was put on him through the mouth of Vojsava in the interview, pressure was put on Ismailaj to put pressure on the Czechs for that decision that he had influenced to take that amount , he would take his share. Fatosi told me that Vojsava Ismailaj was in the presence of Ismailaj's lawyer, who was the closest person to Ismailaj, and the lawyer's son gave the interview in a hotel in Vienna.
I believe that the travel or tickets were paid for all of them by the same hand, but it was an interview requested by them, not to bring it to SPAK and the Prosecutor, because they thought that the Albanian state and the power of Meta was so great , and they gave it to be published on an important Belgian television.
But there was a time when there were riots in Belgium, the television left and was not picked up.
I think it is a complete, intact, raw, authentic interview, let the specialists see it, if he will also offer the direct means for conducting the interview, this will prove it even more.
The main facts were, there was a perception and a political incitement and by political people who at that time were against Meta.
When they saw that Ismailaj was in prison and the prison was becoming real, they made the last move by taking with them those who served them.
The interview is in voice and video, it would appear on Belgian television, taken of her own free will. Meta could have sued him for defamation, but he didn't, but Meta's implication could come out more easily.
I don't see any other motive, but they had their conviction that these who were our guarantors are no longer guarantors. I considered it impossible that Vojsava knew himself as a person between the ERE's decision.
Vojsava was clarified by her own husband, and this did not come up even in the first trial when Ismailaj was convicted, that he knew himself that he would implicate himself.
It was a threat. Not only did it not work out, but Metra has taken a hostile stance to protect itself. The parties have made some moves of goodwill and this contract has been reached.
I believe that SPAK has verified that Meta traveled with Ismailaj to Prague in 2010. Even for the persons Fatosi says, it has been verified that they traveled to meet Vojsava in Vienna at that time to give the interview.
The pressure may have been momentary, but I heard for the first time that Vojsava took this 12-page interview to the American embassy.
With this interview, she also implicated her own husband. He said that together with my husband, senior politicians will be drowned.
He admitted that there is corruption and mentioned Ilir Meta, as the speaker of the Assembly, he also mentioned the former deputy Braho. He also mentioned that my son, who is in school with the son of the chief prosecutor Llalla, has heard that his father will be arrested very soon.
This interview would be used to hit Meta, as revenge. She includes her husband, but says that because my husband is involved in these bargains, my life and my child are in danger. Friends of politics have not responded. Seeing Meta's coldness to protect himself, he took revenge.
Ismailaj was a fraud, a fraud maniac, maybe he wanted to deceive Meta as well. Meta wanted to take 10 million euros of the money and that is the reason why Meta has held a grudge against him.
A part of the money has gone, a part has been confiscated and a part has been spent to take it to arbitration. The gentleman did not like it. The fact that Fatosi was called so late shows that we may be at the end of the investigation.
I think that they wanted to confirm once and for all the authenticity of this evidence ", he says.
Lini një Përgjigje