FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Erion Veliaj, during his speech at the Constitutional Court session, stated that double standards are being applied.
Veliaj also brought up the example of the mayor of Rrogozhina, who he said was convicted but continues to hold office, while he was sent to prison while there is still no decision.
"The Mayor of Rrogozhina has been sentenced to 1 year in prison and continues to perform his duties, I am innocent, detained and I am leaving office. Advice for the future, it is better to commit a crime but for as long as the prison continues, it is better, or not to commit any crime and to maintain your innocence, three detainees. Who prevails?
"There is no final decision. We have a double standard. For someone who is accused, the crime is applied, for someone who is convicted, we have to wait for the final decision ," said Veliaj.
Meanwhile, Erion Veliaj's lawyer asked representatives of the Council of Ministers what document was used by this body to confirm the mayor's absence from office for more than 3 months.
Question: It is alleged that the summons, the presence of Mr. Veliaj at the Council of Ministers did not matter because the fact that he was absent was evident, had been ascertained by the municipal council and would not have changed anything. However, the acts, documents, practices that came from the municipal council, which of the documents, documents proves the fact! That the decision on the security measure was missing, the attendance list was missing, a document from human resources was missing. In the absence of these acts, how did the Council of Ministers ascertain the absence?
Answer: The Council of Ministers counted it in 2 variants. The first one is based on the proposal of the municipal council, the approval of the prefect, and the fact is known worldwide.
Tani u mor vesh mor bisht qeni pse je aty, qenka dhe spiun shkele dhe buken qe han eh mor bisht qeni eh