
The program of "RAI 3" for Albania, published a few days ago, sparked debates in the Media and Public Information Committee today in the Assembly.
We recall that it was MP Ina Zhupa, who requested an urgent meeting of the Committee for Education and Public Information Media to discuss the Italian investigation by "RAI3".
On the other hand, Flutura Açka has reacted by responding to deputy Zhupa, after the "clash" that the latter had with Minister Spiropali.
" There will be real democracy in this commission, I have never vetoed things that are between us, even in things that are addressed to me as the chairman, I have asked to be distributed to you, so that in this commission there is full democracy and there should be no shadow either to the left or to the right. The second point is for Mrs. Zhupa, in one of her posts she made some kind of association of my name with Mrs. Spiropali. It can be a fair concern, but making an association of this nature for whatever reason is not always perceived for the purpose you started it and it can be read by certain people, from certain circles it can also be read as a kind of diversion, it's about my name and I answer for my name myself ", said Açka.
Açka also emphasized that she does not want her name to be associated with any socialist.
" It is a very friendly advice, clashing in public was not my wish, I have been very careful with you and with anyone, but I would not like my name to be associated with any socialist because my public position is very clear , there is no need for any kind of interference to cast a shadow over my person. I would beg you if you have any problem with the chairmanship of the commission, you can say it publicly, I have no shyness to face it, I would not want you to make those shadows that not everyone reads with the purity with which you have had predisposition, in the role of president you probably have greater power, I am a character who fought for freedom of speech. There is no need to associate me with Mrs. Spiropali, who is an honorable woman ," Açka emphasized.
On the other hand, MP Ina Zhupa responded by stating that it was simply a response to Spiropal.
" Spiropali had decided, and for the shame of the other members, not to let Spiropali come out to give a speech on your behalf, it was a response to Mrs. Spiropali, " said Zhupa.
Further, Açka calls on them not to create precedents, while emphasizing that according to her their request is unclear.
"I don't follow Ms. Spiropali because I don't spy on people, it's personal and mine is her personal opinion, I wasn't affected. Your request is unclear as to what you are looking for. In the hearing with the prime minister, you are not very clear about what you are looking for. Don't create precedents ", said Açka.
Lini një Përgjigje