FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
New details are coming to light day by day regarding the 'Gërdeci' file, where the former Minister of Environment Fatmir Mediu is involved.
One of the persons SPAK wants to question in the trial of Gërdec, is Col. Dedgjoni, a former member of the commission set up by the Ministry of Defense on the issue of dismantling.
Questioned in the first trial against the 29 defendants in Gërdec, he stated before the court on April 22, 2011, that he was against the dismantling of the former tank department in Gërdec that was turned into a dismantling factory.
Dedgjoni explained that the dismantling could be done at the army plants in Gramsh or Poliçan where there were the tools and safety conditions to work with the ammunition.
"In 2007, I worked in the Ministry of the Interior in the position of head of the programming sector in the Directorate of Defense Resource Management at the General Staff.
On the basis of order 81 of the Ministry of Defense, I was a member of the dismantling cost assessment group for four types of ammunition. The task of the commission was to evaluate the documentation coming from the ammunition dismantling plants.
It was about the Poliçan, Gramsh and Mjekës plants. The above plants sent their bids, as it was thought that the dismantling would be done at them. Only the policeman gave an answer about the possibility of dismantling, who presented the cost estimate for all four types of ammunition.
While the other two plants said that they were not able to do the dismantling. Based on the evaluation of the Poliçan plant, the costs are also given. Based on the costs of dismantling and the products that came out of it, brass, copper, etc., evaluating these, the cost came out non-negative. Dismantling was profitable. We, as a committee, came to the conclusion that the dismantling should be done at the factory. The commission concluded that the demolition in Poliçan is profitable".
For these objections, he added that he did not agree to sign the draft decision of the Ministry of Defense of 2007 for the dismantling factory in Gërdec.
I don't know if the working group made written conclusions, but I did not sign, I was not present in making the conclusions. In February 2007, I was a member of the commission for determining the prices of demolition ammunition. I contested the decision dated 30.02.2007 on the approval of the sale price for dismantling, as I did not agree. Taking into account that the demolition in Poliçan was profitable, the sale price was the same as that of Poliçan. The price assessment in both cases was not the same. The commission price was lower than the offer coming from Policani. We have not discussed any offer, for any particular company.
The witness also explained the "proposal" received by the American company for dismantling in Gërdec.
It was a letter from a foreign company, which was discussed in the commission of the sale price of ammunition. I say letter, because it was not an official document, it had no letterhead and no seal. As I recall, the commission decided that the prices would be those reflected in that letter. I did not agree as we had discussed the Policeman's offer. The quantity of cartridges requested in that letter was greater than the quantity of cartridges we had for dismantling. I heard these in the commission, since I did not have the inventories of the ammunition depots. The defendant Ylli Pinari has never intervened in relation to the determination of prices. He only requested the price, we decided.
The name of the witness Dedgjoni is listed as number 40 in the list of 71 witnesses that SPAK requested yesterday to be questioned in the Special Court in the process that is being restarted against Fatmir Mediu, where Shkelzen Berisha has also been called as a witness to give explanations before the court. .
Lini një Përgjigje