FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
In the show "The Unexposed", there was a debate between Tedi Blushi and the guests, about the reform in justice, which passed by consensus, even Ilir Meta joined the votes with the SP, against the DP to vote some laws.
Blushi said that Ilir Meta voted for the justice reform and not for Edi Rama.
Excerpts from the debate:
Neritan Sejamini: Why did you give Rama all those mechanisms, when PD was against it? You left PD and joined SP?
Tedi Blushi: The votes were not given to Edi Rama, but to the justice reform.
Ylli Rakipi: Well, he has reformed them. We won't be fooled now...
Neritan Sejamini: You were against Mr. Basha and the opposition.
Tedi Blushi: They didn't give you Rama, but the justice reform.
Andi Bushati: This is an absurd debate. Yes, I agree, they gave it to him.
Ylli Rakipi: You say we voted for the reform, so enjoy it!
Neritan Sejamini: Tell us what went wrong? You have to say where it went wrong. So that we don't make this mistake in the future. A party also has a program.
Tedi Blushi: Yes, former LSI and Mr. Meta voted for the reform. What happened to this reform? You do not consider Arta Mark as the moment when it was undone. Let's stop at the judges of the GJK, did they want to swear in Lana? Did Meta resist? Was GJK caught? Meta appointed the chairman of the vetting? So the one who destroyed and eliminated judges and prosecutors? The reform was undone by Edi Rama, it is not Meta's responsibility.
Neritan Sejamini: There is only one person who has appointed three judges of the GJK, this is Ilir Meta. Let's deal with facts.
Tedi Blushi: Is it a fact that Rama brought to the Parliament the law for the judge to swear in Lana? What was March 2 called for, to stop the capture of GJK from Rama. Is it Meta's fault?
Neritan Sejamini: Do you have any reflections?
Tedi Blushi: The reform has failed, but not through our fault. Meta has fought to defend the reform.
Lini një Përgjigje