FLASH
Shkruar nga Namir Lapardhaja
As the main argument, the Doctor's writing had the fact that "the free vote of the Albanians was violated before it was thrown into the box...", listing the following reasons:
"April 25, a black day in the history of Albania's democracy"
This was the title of Sali Berisha's article published on April 28, 3 days after losing the April 25 elections and one day after Lulzim Basha's first statement about those elections.
As subtitles, since the Doctor is also a master of journalistic findings, his editorial read:
"Undemocratic elections!
Mandate on drugs, crime, buying and abuse of power!
The free vote of the Albanians was executed before it was thrown into the box!"
Further, in a long post, our Doctor, serious and reliable among all Democrats, rightly analyzed the reasons for the defeat of the Democratic Party in those elections, that the Doctor is omniscient and has information about things that others do not see, it has its own sources, within the state structure and, above all, the Digital Citizen, which informs it, almost, about everything.
As the main argument, the Doctor's writing had the fact that "the free vote of the Albanians was violated before it was thrown into the box...", listing the following reasons:
1. From drugs. According to the Doctor in the article of April 28, "the year 2020, i.e. the year before the election, was the year in which, at the invitation of the head of the narco-state, Albania was covered with cannabis de juro medicinalis, and de facto "electoralis".
2. The drug state. According to the Doctor in the article of April 28, "in this election, more than in any other campaign, the narco-state turned into the electoral machinery of Medusa's Head".
3. Vote buying in the April 25 election was more massive than ever before. According to the Doctor in the article of April 28, "it turned into an almost public mega market.... With these amounts, at least 10-12 mandates were bought..."
Then our Doctor rightly and with the rhetorical skill that has always characterized him raises the question:
"Under these circumstances...: Should the opposition follow this electoral farce?"
And immediately comes the answer of the great Doctor, who, without hesitation and with the determination that characterizes him, says:
"My answer is a definite Yes!"
The writing is long and today, a few years after the defeat of April 25 and after the almost total destruction of the opposition party with the alibi of hostage-taking and selling to Lulzim Basha's opponent, I came back to it again with the awareness of reading between the lines, with the idea that I did not find any hint between the words, that no subtext was implied in the writing about any possible betrayal on the part of Basha, about any conspiracy or any accumulated bitterness about the decisions taken over the years.... In a word, I returned to writing again with the aim of finding some implicit message that pointed to some rift in the relationship between them.
But, to the detriment of my aim, I found nothing.
I did not see in this article any accusations against Peng Basha, for the seller of opposition causes, for the man bought by Edi Rama and the international mafia, for the blackest president the Democrats have had in these 30 years.
I did not read in that analysis "Rama stole our elections and his hostage betrayed us..."
I didn't even read a normal and friendly request to resign and open the race for the new chairman in the Democratic Party.
On the contrary, this article by the Doctor comes a day after Basha's official reaction to the result of those elections and notarizes the official position of Basha's Democratic Party.
That is, this attitude of the Doctor and that of Basha the day before are in complete harmony.
What attitudes the Doctor has today and his "hostages" for that result and for his man at the head of the DP is clear and there is no point in repeating.
Even, in his famous "Foltoret", among others, he stated that he would not have participated in the April 25 elections, because the result was sold.
I did not bring this attention back to Sali Berisha, because he is the most incoherent politician that the transition policy has known. He is the politician who has accused people of murder and then appeared on TV in their arms and denied them, saying they were done for political reasons. And his "hostages" have accepted it. I didn't even do it for the militants below the Balcony.
I did it for the sake of Facts. If the Facts matter, of course.
But also to show that, regardless of myopia with or without intention, there is another category of people who do not think like the crowd, also because they cannot play the role of a fool and cannot deceive themselves.
Of course, today there is a new reality, with hostages and others sold, with SPAK and party leaders, etc., etc., but after a few years even this current rhetoric will seem very absurd, very untrue and, on top of that, all, it will be to complete a general puzzle on which the historical analysis will rise in the future.
Lini një Përgjigje