FLASH
Shkruar nga Ylli Pata
This so-called political selection was not selected by prosecutors, but by the intensity of political positions!
SPAK has justified its action against high-level officials with a political denunciation, as was the case with Monika Kryemadhi in 2017 against Lefter Koka and Alqi Bllako.
Until this period, the special prosecution dealt with lecturers and second-level officials. The denunciation of the Chief Justice brought a domino effect, when the legal offices of the parties in the country flocked to SPAK with lawsuits for certain issues. Taulant Balla once again brought the Partizani case that he had previously brought to the General Prosecutor's Office, Nisma Thurje and the DP sent a series of denunciations for concessions to the Ministry of Health and others. Later, there were also individual denunciations for cases such as Ahmetaj's, or Ilir Meta's.
Who were politically attacked as being instigated by political circles. Meanwhile, the denunciation of Erion Veliaj, along with the permanent lynching against him, came only from Sali Berisha and his political circle.
This, in general terms, is the first case that SPAK has worked on. A case that will ultimately come from someone, but the essence is that it is the Special Prosecution Office that sets a work and logical priority.
The imperative that has made SPAK an institution with high popular expectations is none other than the fight against impunity. That is, to investigate those politicians and officials who have caused trouble over the years, just to avoid facing justice.
And this is precisely the normal and logical perception of what should be the turn or dialectic of an institution that has been established for the first time in the country. But SPAK chose the so-called political balance. So that there should be a selection or movement from both sides, even though this has not happened.
But the truth is that this so-called political selection was not selected by prosecutors, but by the intensity of political stances or the decibels of dinner panels, which are nothing more than extensions of political headquarters.
And in the Veliaj case, we are clearly dealing with a case opened only by the ferocity and intensity of the Democratic Party's political attacks. Not at all with the normal or dialectical logic of a chronological investigation.
Erion Veliaj has been active in politics in the country since 2013, while the others have been since 1990. So he does not constitute the substrate of that group that has sucked the state's juices by taking endless positions, vegetating in decision-making and enriching itself from office.
Veliaj is a politician who became mayor of Tirana in 2015 and has since been attacked endlessly, but has managed to win 3 consecutive terms like no other with a formidable popularity record. What makes him a political power on the rise is completely normal. This power of Veliaj has brought both the attack and the denunciations. But should SPAK enter this political war to smear a political figure whose popularity is not decreasing? This does not at all exclude the investigation, the process, the judicial debate that could also be an explanation of these attacks and accusations. But how can a double arrest of a man and a woman be interpreted in the middle of an electoral campaign, while the parallel precedent is free, although a serious accusation? Here we are in a pure political act!
Lini një Përgjigje