FLASH
Shkruar nga Spartak Ngjela
Indeed, it is the power of money that makes a miser, a miser. But as soon as his wealth reaches the millions, money again imposes itself on him: because it now drives him internally to help the poor, open free restaurants and invest in health and education.
Miserliness is a feeling that starts when the poor person starts the process that takes him to get rich. But the great wealth, then, this miser throws in charity.
How is this explained?
I.
All this is a process of a psyche that is influenced by the power of money. A poor man is not bothered by the power of money at all, because he has no money. He thinks of money in order to have it, but due to the fact that he does not have it, it does not create its power against him.
But as soon as this poor man becomes rich, the power of money begins over him, and this power throws him into avarice. It is not yet known about the miser today: is he in love with money as a means of living, or is it the power of money that takes him with him?
Indeed, it is the power of money that makes a miser, a miser. But as soon as his wealth reaches the millions, money again imposes itself on him: because it now drives him internally to help the poor, open free restaurants and invest in health and education.
But, the question that arises in this case is this: is this individual, even in these acts of charity, motivated by money? for - how can a miser become a charitable being?
Well, this has been the report that has had a special study in relation to human psychology, which, as a function of money, suddenly goes from extreme to extreme.
But the most correct idea seems to be that which admits that power is always money; because this force is what dominates the mind and thought, and therefore the creation of these individuals develops and develops only towards making money.
Therefore, all the great fortunes of particular individuals, in one form or another, have been created by avarice, which in the normal term is called saving, or savings with which wealth is created.
Then, with this money, the miser started investing and this is where the journey towards unlimited wealth began...
II.
We must admit that the individual loves money under an unconscious feeling, but that in fact it also conquers his conscience.
Yes, how does an individual go from avarice to charity?
The transition from avarice to wealth is understandable, but the transition from great wealth to charity is still under discussion. Miserliness or high saving leads the individual to wealth, but how do you move from miserliness to charity?
That is, this is a process that goes through a ratio of four: poverty, avarice, wealth, charity... and this is exactly what requires a special study of the human psyche. But, anyway, until now it has been accepted in the literature that charity is probably the memory of the miser when he was poor, and therefore he, now that he is rich, deep down feels as if he is helping himself. Distant memory brings this to the first self, and the first self reminds him of poverty, and the alms or monetary help he is giving now and then now that he is rich seems to him to be helping his former self.
But Shakespeare in Hamlet suddenly asks: "Does fate make love, or does love make fate and man?"
But we can also now ask with this Shakespearean reason: Does money bring love, or does love bring fate and humanity?
Lini një Përgjigje