FLASH
Shkruar nga Klodian Tomorri
This is potentially indicative of a criminal offense. Who paid for it? If the government didn't pay for it, it could potentially have been paid for by the Sinaloa cartel, Cosa Nostra, Hamas, ISIS.
One of the biggest public follies, which has occurred with great frequency in recent years, is this story of the prime minister's travels.
Whenever news comes out that the prime minister traveled by private jet, there is a standard response: The money for the plane was not paid for by the Albanian government and taxpayers.
This answer is given by an agency that they have created to inform the public. What is an MIA, MIA.
This MIA exists only for this job, which means that the people did not pay for the prime minister's plane. No one has ever seen any other transparency from the MIA.
But what if. I blame MIA. The problem lies in MIA's response: The government did not pay for the plane.
This is potentially indicative of a criminal offense. Who paid for it? If the government didn't pay for it, it could potentially have been paid for by the Sinaloa cartel, Cosa Nostra, Hamas, ISIS.
These MIA people and those who run them are so stupid that they say this publicly and think it's a good thing.
Now people are guessing who pays for the prime minister's planes and why.
Sometimes they pay him because they want him as a mascot. Sometimes they get him a concession, or an exclusive arms contract, and so on.
If the prime minister absolutely has to travel by private jet, this sentence that the government did not pay is murderous.
It is 2,000 times more profitable for Mileti to pay for the prime minister's own planes than for unknown financiers, who then grab large chunks of public wealth.
Lini një Përgjigje