FLASH
Shkruar nga Namir Lapardhaja
Attacking Kajsi with this kind of language shows that the DP not only does not want to break away from the past, but like a sick patient, it has also lost the desire to heal.
While the opposition appears as a soulless body, without ideas and in clinical death, the only thing happening beyond it is the debate between journalists Andi Bushati and Blendi Kajsiu. This debate, although not born within the structures of a functional party, as it should be, is one of the few real processes of critical thought that are taking place today around the right. Paradoxically, by two leftists.
Bushati, once one of the harshest critics of Berisha and the Democratic Party, has today become an ardent and extremely aggressive defender of this same political configuration. This transformation is strange: how is it possible that a figure who for years has spoken about the “DP gang” today considers it the only alternative to Rama’s government, without explaining what fundamental changes have occurred within it? This dilemma gives a contradictory character to his current positions.
On the other hand, Kajsiu, who unlike Bushati, has maintained a constant and constructive criticism towards the opposition and is clear on the problems of power. He has long articulated the idea that in order to have a credible opposition, the DP must change its face, modernize its discourse and clearly break away from its authoritarian heritage. Unlike Bushati, Kajsiu has not changed his critical line, continuing to seek a radical and necessary change, without getting entangled in personal or emotional defense towards old political figures.
A significant detail is the fact that Kajsiu, until recently on the periphery of political attacks, has recently been attacked as a "gang and crime analyst", a lynchpin language that Kajsiu speaks out against as a necessity that the DP needs to be an alternative to the wooden language of power and authoritarian systems in general.
Attacking Kajsi with this kind of language shows that the DP not only does not want to break away from the past, but like a sick patient, it has also lost the desire to heal.
Although both come from leftist backgrounds and beliefs, it is worth noting that their positions are clear. Kajsiu articulates a critique and vision for change of the opposition, so that it can be a real and credible alternative, while Bushati, on the contrary, has stuck to a discourse that seems more like an extension of the rhetoric of Berisha and his people, which, in fact, does nothing more than give even more credence to Kajsiu's theses about what the opposition and the DP should do differently.
However, even though the DP does not produce any new ideas or any credible alternatives, it is positive that two left-wing analysts are debating and discussing it. In the absence of politics, we have a clash of ideas that illuminates the noisy darkness of today's opposition, which is preparing to go on summer vacation to return again in September and repeat the same mistakes of the past.
Lini një Përgjigje