FLASH
Shkruar nga Ylli Pata
Donald Lu's metaphor was a styleme, a pore and a symbol. It was a political concept to show that there should not be people who are untouchable by the law.
Only Romana Vlahutin spoke today, but it is likely that Donald Lu will also speak. The first two US and EU ambassadors who supported the justice reform in Albania spoke of it as "The Untouchables".
Even Donald Lu, as a known cinephile, illustrated his idea with Brian de Palma's cult masterpiece, starring the cream of the seventh art world. It was about "The Untouchables", which tells not just the story of the arrest, but of being sent to trial and then succeeding in bringing down the shield for one of the most powerful men of the beginning of the century - the Chicago gangster, Al Capone.
Donald Lu's metaphor was a styleme, a pore and a symbol. It was a political concept to show that there should not be people who are untouchable by the law. When he was asked at that time, he mentioned names of crime barons like Shullazi, Kanani and others, who today seem very small, but in reality they were not. They were criminal cosmos that for years no one touched them, they made agreements with those who had the power. In terms of financial figures, they were more powerful than conventional businessmen, and in the media they had their own connections.
Logically, Donald Lu was right, even though he didn't have drug lords in mind. After all, in a country like Albania, the real barons are high, very high.
Only two people were shocked by Donald Lu's cinematic metaphor: Sali Berisha and Ilir Meta. Who, not only opposed the justice reform, but left nothing unsaid to the two ambassadors. They even followed him to distant Kyrgyzstan, when the desolate Donald Lu was at his own business,
There is a narration by the people in favor of Berisha and Meta, to show that the logic of justice reform has been brought from the West to the Balkans to remove those they call "kokorrocha". That is, they have their own opinion. But in fact, both Berisha and Meta have had no opposition to Western policies, only when the allies asked to fight corruption.
On the other hand, all those accused, arrested, or convicted in the Balkans for corruption, never attacked justice, the West and the Ambassadors. Ivo Sanader, Nikola Gruevski, etc., even though they fled the country, basically faced the trial with their lawyers, until they were convicted. So they fought a battle, and did not go against justice.
Berisha and Meta are the only ones who call this justice, the site made to punish them. Well, why don't they face this justice, when the members of the Political Bureau of the ALP have done this in the past.
Do they have great wealth? They have! Did they earn it legally? Let them explain it, in court. But all this fuss with fire and bombs all these years have prevented this day from coming, so they were called "Intouchables". In reality, Donald Lu and Romana Vlahutin didn't mention them at all, only they burned the fly under their hat and didn't leave anything without telling them.
Is Lulka to blame?
Lini një Përgjigje