FLASH
Shkruar nga Ylli Pata
Why does Fatos Lubonja say that it is a law? Because the narrative of this entourage has neither logic nor substance. It's just pure agenda. An agenda, where there is a detailed lynching plan, fathers' plans to create a reality that should be even when it is not.
Fatos Lubonja, one of the public opponents of Edi Rama's government and majority, declared last night that Sali Berisha is in the process, simply because a law has been changed. He added that Rama is not under investigation as he has approved 18 decisions.
This public discourse is the essence of what is called the nocturnal pretense of prosecutors or dinner panel lawyers.
And if to this is added a few years of lynching the opponents of Sali Berisha, from Saimir Tahiri onwards, you see what is the modus operandi of a ready detachment that is called to create or spread a media fable.
Sali Berisha is not accused of changing a law. We are talking about the Partizani case. Berisha is in the process of changing the sports law to give state property to his daughter's family. Property, where the girl's family built 19 towers, which are a wealth created precisely by the creaking, screaming abuse of power of the prime minister.
In addition to the case of Partizan, Berisha in this case, as Lubonja recalled, is also denounced for two of the biggest human catastrophes in the country; Gërdec, where 28 people died and over 200 were injured, and on January 21, where 4 innocent citizens were killed and dozens were also injured.
We have never had a lynching narrative, to such a drama, those who have accused Sali Berisha, have simply tried to bring facts about the events in question.
Meanwhile, in the case of Erion Veliajt, the mayor of Tirana, he has long been the most lynched man by a large part of this political and media establishment.
Veliaj is a heavy political weight, as he is in office in the third term of the most important political office in Albania after that of the prime minister. As such, it is under surveillance, attack or even so-called "natural" accusations.
As a heavyweight, the attack on Veliaj, as happened with Edi Rama when he was mayor, is expected, but it all depends on the form.
Today, we have a procedure initiated by SPAK regarding the mayor's property. A procedure that, as the special prosecutor's office said, is in its infancy. Everything that is said comes from "reliable sources", not only does it not match, but even if it matches, it has a long way to go.
The essence of it all is the investigation, which today, unlike yesterday, is happening on senior officials and politicians.
And why does lynching happen on one side, while on the other side they don't even dare to mention it, even when the facts are humiliating, we talk shamelessly that there is no evidence? But what evidence do they require when the daughter, namely the son-in-law, was given a piece of land from the richest people in the capital, which belonged to the state, to build 19 towers.
Why did this privatization or change of ownership happen only with Partizan, and not with Tirana, Dinamo, Vllaznina or Flamurtar? Because a government decision was needed. And Sali Berisha took this decision to enrich his family. There is no need for a lynching here, as the fact is inside, even so inside that the heart of Tirana is sealed with the carpets of the doctor's VIP son-in-law.
Why does Fatos Lubonja say that it is a law? Because the narrative of this entourage has neither logic nor substance. It's just pure agenda. An agenda, where there is a detailed lynching plan, fathers' plans to create a reality that should be even when it is not.
When in fact everything has only one answer; if there is an investigation, the process must be awaited. What follows from the investigation happens, but the investigation does not take place in the studio. That we take the big cases; have the panels talked about the Partizani case for example? Very little!
In short, the x-ray of the lynching shows the symptoms of a fable, which is essentially political. Where the parties do it to create an agenda, but not that it happens, because if it happens, developments must be waited for.
In a way, they are just waiting for a Mehmet Sheh, or Beqir Balluk, a scapegoat, that is, to comment on it, while in front of their eyes is a more serious development that they simply call a "change in the law".
Lini një Përgjigje