FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
KLP is at a very delicate crossroads, in a difficult time. Where, after the strong offensive of SPAK, the majority has taken a political initiative to put a 'limit on what they say' to the Special Prosecutor's Office...
The sudden explosion of the 'storm' in the High Council of Prosecution, is not a 'one-off' in the open sky.
Everything is taking place at a time when SPAK, the most important institution of KLP dependency has turned into the number 1 enemy of politics.
Alfred Balla, the chairman of the KLP, who was elected from the ranks of non-governmental organizations, was suddenly dismissed by the General College of Appeal, banning him from approaching the judiciary for at least 15 years.
Balla is only one of the members of the KLP, even though he is a member, although his role has weight in setting the agenda.
Meanwhile, two other members of the High Council of Prosecution, Tartar Bazaj and Nurihan Seiti, have finished their mandate on time.
KLP is at a very delicate crossroads, in a difficult time. Where, after the strong offensive of SPAK, the majority has undertaken a political initiative to put a 'limit to what they say' to the Special Prosecutor's Office.
It is no coincidence that all this takes place on a day when the Assembly is discussing not only the majority resolution for the "new reform in Justice", but also the New Reform Commission which will in all likelihood be led by Fatmir Xhafaj. A commission that, if it will not limit SPAK, will change the laws on which the activity of the Special Prosecution is based.
The signals are that the Criminal Code and the Code of Procedure will be changed, for cases of abuse of duty, where the ability of SPAK to arrest or declare a state official as a defendant will be limited to detention. However, we are still in hypotheses, in any case, only logic makes us understand that we are dealing with a power shake-up within the body that chooses not only the leaders of SPAK but also the prosecutors.
The three members whose mandate has ended: Balla, Bazaj and Seiti, in the dramatic voting for the head of SPAK, did not vote for Altin Duman, but for Kondil, who was spoken of as the majority's favorite candidate.
And in this environment, it seems clear that the internationals are playing their game to keep this important institution as independent as possible. Whom the majority is blackmailing with the parallel commission, but also with threats to intervene in the Criminal Code. Which, if done as they say, can greatly narrow the range of action of the Special Prosecutor's Office. For example, an official, if the article of abuse of office falls, cannot be declared under investigation without proving the case of bribery, passive corruption or conflict of interest.
In the meantime, it is said that other articles of the Criminal Code may also have changes, mainly those related to the prosecution of officials under reasonable suspicion.
But will Americans and Europeans allow such a catapulting of the institution that controls judicial appointments?
The chances are that it will not happen, and as it seems, the departure of the head of the KLP opens a new game in front of Edi Rama's intention to undertake a "new reform in justice". Which could crumble within days if SPAK causes a tornado with its investigations.
Edi Rama asks to play the 'fait accompli' right before the new reform is approved, which, as we know, will have the assistance of the American OBDAT and Europe's EURALIUS for the first time. Therefore, the removal of the head of the KLP seems to be a very strong game, and there is no wonder that a leader of SPAK is placed at the head of this institution, who will then bring almost the entire prosecution body under a strong blind euroatlantic./ Pamphlet
Lini një Përgjigje