FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Security expert, Nuredin Ibishi, has spoken about the course of investigations into the murder of Liridona Ademaj.
According to Ibish, there were deviations in the evidence, where each of the suspects is trying to remove the burden of responsibility from themselves by manipulating the investigations, however, it will be the Prosecution that through the evidence gathered from the scene, security cameras or even witness statements will clarify the case very quickly.
Focusing on Ademaj's execution, Ibishi said in "Breaking" that Murseli's dark plan to kill the young woman came after a marital crisis in Sweden.
It remains in the hands of the Priority to come out with a preliminary finding of the investigations and say something more detailed because in reality a whole confusion is being created from the fragmented statements.
Is it intended to misdirect the investigations, to cover up other persons? Who exactly are you referring to?
I think that everyone is trying to remove the burden of responsibility from themselves by manipulating the investigations. But the Prosecutor together with the police and the evidence collected from the scene, the security cameras or even the statements of the witnesses will clarify the case to the end and it will not be long until the indictment is also filed for persons who are already in custody.
What about the attitude of family members? Statements received from Naim Murseli's father? Initially, he said that he was not aware of any conflicts between the couple, and recently in a statement, he cast doubt on relationships with other people that may have led to this serious event.
Based on these statements that are being made, it seems that Naim Murseli did not take his wife from home, but she came by herself. In this way, I am cutting off the possibility of a direct intervention in the event, first by taking the victim from the family and then sending them to the last dinner with the two children in the restaurant before the execution. All this attempt by the husband to cover up the incident will not take long to be revealed after the indictment is handed down.
And the information they may have in electronic means. Phones unlocked, information received? Why are they not being informed?
All are at the time of examination to know. The executor or spouse in this case had high level knowledge enough to delete them, however traces remain in the system. Currently, the examination continues for the extraction of data from mobile phones, from the communication system itself, but also from the security cameras. So this whole situation will round off the investigations. I think that receiving the statements of the family members will be very significant and will actually contradict the statement made by the husband and at the same time the executor.
It remains to be seen with mystery the cause that prompted the husband and other persons to involve Liridona Ademaj. How long was the murder of the deceased planned?
There has been a crisis in marital relations since they were in Sweden. This was also the initiative for the separation of the crown, but it was recovered as a situation. However, since then the husband has started the dark plan for her execution. Now Murseli is trying to deny the whole course of the event. Also, it is said that there was impropriety in marital relations, although still unconfirmed.
Lini një Përgjigje