
Mirel Josa thinks that Armando Broja must be at Euro 2024, although first he needs to return to his best form.
Invited to "Sport News" on "News 24", the well-known coach analyzed the game of the Reds and Blacks in the two friendlies in March, focusing on the appearances of the special elements available to Silvinho. In the conversation with the moderator Trevisa Tufa, he emphasized that the midfield had to come back to perform in the qualifiers, as it had not been at the expected level.
Two games, 2 losses, 4 goals conceded, none scored. Should we be concerned about these numbers?
I have the opinion that there will be concern, normally. The people running the team look better. Better that they happened now, they were matches that I call control, not friendly. In these matches, new streams and player states are checked.
Did the pressure of the final list affect these two tests? Do you believe that Silvinho got what he wanted from these two friendlies?
The coach has seen the team, he has a basic team with which he has qualified. In these matches, you can't put the "seal", if they will be the ones you will take in the European or not.
If I share Chile, it was difficult to find something positive, how did the match with Sweden leave you?
Having seen both matches I can say something. In the game against Chile, we didn't run properly, maybe because it was the first game, there were some changes. These were very charged, but the problem was that they haven't played each other in a while.
"Silvinjo showed that he can change, we won Broja, and a new tactical module", said professor Sokol Kushta. What do you think, we have really gained a new module, how did the alignment against Sweden look?
The formation against Sweden in my opinion was a 4-3-3.
Curiosity was great to see Broja from the first minute, how do you rate his performance?
I can't do the competent. The national team needs the number. Considering also the progress he had during this period, there were many fluctuations. We do not have the luxury of leaving Broja out of the national team. Don't forget we still have 2 months to go.
"We have a point of reference in the attack, a 9", said Sylvinho, do you believe that Broja will lead the attack in Europe?
The counter should do its job. I think it will be 100 percent, we don't have the luxury of leaving it out. During this time, he must do his best.
There are two players who have been tested a little in these two friendlies, Muçi and Muçolli. What do you think about these two professor players, can they have a role in Europe?
I can't talk about something like that. I know Arbër Hoxha after I trained him in Prishtina. During this time, there was a period of injury, while he went to Dinamo Zagreb, I think he will give more. I cannot speak for Muçolli. I can talk a lot about Muçi, he will be in the national team that will go there.
We have a total overcrowding in the attacking phase, in your view, who has the safe place?
Cikalleshi and Broja will play a place together. Asan's contribution is not rejected. Seferi is one of those players we need.
If we go down a little lower, is the midfield tight, with the duo Asllan-Ramadani and Bajram in front of them? Or can we also see Laci in the midfield, as happened against Sweden?
These four cannot all play together. Ramadani does not move from the formation. With the contribution he has made, Asllani has the safest place. Then, Bajrami-Muçi will be discussed.
Silvinjo appeared amazed by Mario Mitaj. How would you rate his performance? Is he ready to take a big step in his career, recently Juventus has also been interested?
Mitaj has shown exceptional personality. Silvinho was very convinced when he activated this player. With his age, the personality of this player belongs to a high level
If the left side looks safe, on the right this time Silvinjo tried Balliu. Is there dualism in this wing, or does Hysaj have a safe place?
We can't say anything. They are players who play at the same levels. It depends on what the coach will ask and how their condition will be.
Yes, the center of defense, we showed a lot of problems in these two friendlies. Ismajli or Kumbulla, who do you see as Gjimshit's ideal partner?
Next to Gjimshit, should be Ismajli. As for Mihaj, he made some mistakes, but we shouldn't blame him. Yesterday was a difficult match for him, considering the way Sweden played.
But in the goal, there are dilemmas, between Strakosha and Berisha, who do you see more advantaged, both do not play for the respective teams...
They don't play at all. With the condition that Strakosha showed yesterday, it was another thing. The coach will see who is in the best condition. Yesterday Strakosha was perfect.
In these two tests, who would you single out, for good, and a player who did not fully convince you, or there are too many here...
I expected more from Asllani in these matches. I can't say disappointment, but that he could do more. I can't speak of disappointments. I expected much more from some players. The team went in with the mindset that they must definitely win.
Does this team convince you for the European Championship, can we make any surprises, get any positive results?
The team expresses its own game. Let's be like in the elimination matches.
Lini një Përgjigje