TAGS-AT E JAVËS

Aktualitet2025-07-08 22:09:00

Rama's attacks on the prosecutor in Shkodra, Beci: Arrogance and pressure, why wasn't the decision appealed?

Shkruar nga Pamfleti

Rama's attacks on the prosecutor in Shkodra, Beci: Arrogance and pressure,

Eugen Beci, former Serious Crimes Prosecutor, considers Prime Minister Edi Rama's attacks on the Shkodra prosecutor as arrogance and pressure from one government against another.

Invited to the show 'A Show' on Syri TV, Beci said that you can never anathematize a prosecutor's office without exhausting all levels of the judiciary, as he referred to the decision of the Shkodra Prosecutor's Office to not initiate investigations into the containers in Theth.

According to Beci, remarks towards other powers should be made according to constitutional and legal frameworks, not by ordering a ministry that has no connection to the issue.

"If the prosecutor makes a decision not to initiate proceedings due to a police report, there is no need for a video of the Benz for a procedural action," Beci said, among other things.

He said that "there are several elements of the Criminal Procedure Code that preserve independence and the pressures that come from the videos of the Benzes."

"Legal uncertainty has spread its roots not only among the people but also in state and constitutional institutions. The government with the Prime Minister at the helm interferes in another institution that is independent, is removed from the executive branch. Let's examine how the government can brutally interfere in the work of the prosecution, for better or worse. The element of the independence of institutions. Remarks to the other power must be made according to the constitutional framework. And remarks from the other power are not made by ordering the Minister of Justice...

Wrongly ordering the Minister of Justice to investigate, but it is other institutions that judge. But even the judgment decision, this is arrogance of power towards other power.

If the prosecutor decides not to prosecute due to a police report, there is no need for a video of the incident, but for a procedural action.

Go out and tell the State Police, that the prosecutor's action, take it and appeal it to court. Overturn the final decision and then go to the ILD. All these elements of the Criminal Procedure Code are to preserve independence and preserve the pressures that come from the pressures of the police.

The Shkodra Prosecutor's Office should initiate verifications of who has built without a permit. It is up to them to show, according to the law and legal logic, in this illogical conflict how that village came to be built through actions or inactions. If the prosecutor's office finds that based on the law of the territory, they do not constitute a violation, then regulate the law.

It creates a relativization of the prosecution body, it is that in the name of the state it files criminal charges, protects freedoms, punishes criminals. To relativize the prosecution, as you shout at the IKMT inspector, is not the same thing. You have the entire mechanism to appeal the prosecution's decision. The pressure goes all the way to the patronage.

Not only SPAK but also the prosecution, it is impossible for another body to file a lawsuit. For the incinerator file, it would have to be joined to have a full investigation, it had to go to the end. It is a formula that definitely had to be done. Fier, Tirana, Elbasan are intertwined with each other.

"Even SPAK knows it, but there are some balances that could harm the investigation," said Beci.

Lini një Përgjigje