FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Argita Malltezi, speaking about the SPAK file against Sali Berisha and Jamarbër Malltezi, stated that the right path was not followed with his father.
Invited to the "Te Paespozuarit" show, Malltezi said that Berisha knew the consequences of not implementing the security measure "obligation to appear", but for him it was a matter of principle and he did not want to violate the Constitution.
" These are things that have been discussed with the lawyers and have become present. He was clear about the consequences. The reason was not to create a precedent of violating the Constitution, through the mashes of power. In this case it was Dumani. Why didn't Rama take it to the parliament this case? Because the file had no evidence. This crossing, which is contrary to all the documents of the Council of Europe, that is, this seizure of power, without respecting anything else, was done to create a breach of the Constitutional order, a breach of what it must be a barrier.
You talk about decisions that follow a fair legal process, guaranteed in the Convention and laws. There are judges who break the law for example. But the right path was not followed here, the right path is to go to the Parliament. We asked him to go to the GJK. If we will live in a legal state where there is predictability and legal certainty, where powers are separated, where the Convention, the Constitution is respected... the precedent, was it Saimir Tahiri who was given the authorization for the same reasons?
The one who understands that he can hit you and you accept, has no intention of doing it again. If you're going to stand for principle, stand the first time it's broken. We said, we have certified with three degrees, you think this, why didn't you execute as another coercive measure? This decision has never been executed for Sali Berisha. They put him under arrest without giving him an execution order without a final order ," Malltezi said.
Lini një Përgjigje