FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
A final court decision on agricultural property under Law 7501 is not being implemented, because the property was alienated during the trial and this alienation was registered and kept active by ASHK Tirana Rurale no. 2, headed by Eni Sejdinaj, which in its official response refused to register the court decision, giving legal effect to the donation contracts concluded the day before the Appeal, an action that has prevented the execution of justice and raises serious suspicions of abuse of office and corruption, a matter that requires criminal investigation.
The case relates to an agricultural property acquired under Law 7501, for which there is a final court decision ordering the return and registration of the property in the name of the agricultural family, but which is not implemented in practice, because while the case was still pending, the property was alienated and this alienation was kept active in the register by the Tirana Rural Land Registry Office No. 2, which then used this very fact to not implement the court decision.
The property belongs to Petrit Bardhi's agricultural family and has been documented since 1991 with a family certificate, which lists Sanie Bardhi, Alban Bardhi, Çezar Bardhi and Kumrije Bardhi, a certificate that serves as the basis for the benefit under Law 7501 and on which the court has based its decision, ordering the deletion of subsequent registrations and the registration of the property in the name of the agricultural family.
Over the years, the property has been registered in the name of Qemal Bardhi and Fiqiri Bardhi, persons who are not beneficiaries according to Law 7501, which has led to the opening of the judicial process that was closed with decision no. 4636, dated 25.05.2017, of the Tirana Judicial District Court, a decision that was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 20.11.2024, giving the case final form and making the decision mandatory for implementation.
One day before the announcement of this final decision, on 19.11.2024, Qemal Bardhi and Fiqiri Bardhi entered into donation contracts and transferred the properties subject to the trial to their sons, Bledi Qemal Bardhi and Denis Fiqiri Bardhi, carrying out an alienation within the family, during the trial and without any real economic transaction, an action that changed the owner only on paper.
This alienation was registered in the Cadastre and was maintained as an active legal status, while after the Appeal decision was made public, a request was submitted for the registration of the court decision, but ASHK Tirana Rural No. 2 responded negatively, admitting that the assets had undergone transactions during the trial and stating that it could not implement the decision, because the current owners in the register were not parties to the process.
This response bears the signature of the Tirana Rural Local Directorate ASHK No. 2 and is signed by Ms. Eni Sejdinaj, who in this case has taken a concrete administrative decision that has prohibited the implementation of a final court decision, giving legal effect to a donation contract concluded during the trial and holding it over the court decision.
In practice, this action has led to the suspension of the execution of the decision, a fact also noted by the private bailiff Shpëtim Allamani, who, after initiating the execution procedures and encountering the obstacle created by the registered alienation, referred the case to the prosecutor's office as an obstacle created for the administration of justice.
At this point, the issue is no longer just a property conflict, because the court has decided, but a serious institutional problem related to the role of ASHK Tirana Rurale No. 2 in actively maintaining an alienation carried out during the trial and in effectively stopping a final decision, which raises direct questions about how these decisions were made and the real reasons why a court decision is not implemented.
These are questions that require official answers and investigation, because if a donation contract concluded one day before the Appeal and an administrative decision by the ASHK are enough to block justice, then every judicial decision on property remains vulnerable to the same scheme. (continued) /Pamphlet
po kjo eshte normale per ashk ....do ish habe te ndodhte ndryshe ! eshte institucioni me i erret ne shqiperi pas gjyqsor dhe prokurori ,ku pos pagove ta harrosh se mbaron pune ! por ka me keq sia mban kujt me u mar me ta ...cfaredo pozicioni kane ne qeveri ,i sfidoj publikisht te vertetojne te kunderten
Korupsion i gjalle
Ligji 7501 dhe gjithë derivatet e tij , ishin ligje antikombëtare dhe me pasoja katastrofike për shtetin. Politikbërësit kanë përgjegjësi morale dhe penale për katrahurën që gatuan. Janë ata që sot kërkojnë t'ja lënë stafetën njeri tjetrit.