FLASH
Shkruar nga Ylli Pata
The release of Berisha today by the GJKKO has broken the false myth created as a fable for Berisha's fanatics, that the arrest and solitary confinement is a preliminary scenario.
Sali Berisha, even though he has flagrantly defied Albanian justice, even breaking the law by not appearing in SPAK, even though he has called the special prosecution a "criminal gang", his lawyers have been working day by day with procedures to achieve his purpose.
The release of Berisha today by the GJKKO has broken the false myth created as a fable for Berisha's fanatics, that the arrest and solitary confinement is a preliminary scenario.
The decision of GJKKO has also dispelled the myth falsely created by Ilir Meta that special courts are subject to SPAK.
Although we had other cases where a judge did not approve the request of the prosecutors, or partially approved it, before the arrest of Meta, a bombardment was launched to put the court under pressure.
The situation today is such that the Court has approved the request of the lawyers, which will probably have the relevant motivation, on the other hand SPAK has announced that it will appeal.
We are in the full sense in a function of the justice gear of VIPs, as the "untouchables" who have been in this country for 33 years are being judged.
Meanwhile, the decision to release Sali Berisha is a typical precedent in itself. Decision which, with the release of the complete provision, will issue the explanatory motivation for taking the decision.
However, in a way, a new standard has been set, which is not taboo in itself, but which until now was considered taboo.
So today, with this decision, the Court has reinforced the model or precedent of following a Subject under investigation or in a trial for corruption, even in a free state.
In the precedent, which will be shaped by the battle that will take place in the Court of Appeal. It is not at all taboo to take a soft security measure, even when dealing with a sensational file.
This is a phenomenon that has become standard in Western countries. In addition to first degree murder, terrorism, drug traffickers who have mass-murdered or ordered murder, all others who are accused are generally followed in various security measures, and not all are in "prison custody".
If the Appeal will confirm the decision of the first instance, the current precedent will be reinforced and turn into a formal "legislation".
What does this mean, that the "draconian measures" will not be in the future as a solution to the possible operations of the special prosecutor's office, against VIPs investigated for abuse of office or corruption.
Meanwhile, the decision, as expected, has also opened various conspiracy theories, starting from the so-called "Trump influence" which is a hornet, the other brochulla related to the request in Strasbourg, or what many think that this decision is part of of the Rama-Berisha pact.
For Stasburg's theory, it is completely illogical for the European Court of Human Rights to consider a security measure. Stasburg will consider only a final decision from all levels of the judiciary.
Meanwhile, the "pact" theory will continue to be nurtured, since in reality there has been a pact for months between the majority and Berisha's DP. So this theory, even though it may not stand, will feed the minds and analyzes of those who believe it.
Lini një Përgjigje