TAGS-AT E JAVËS

Politike2023-10-25 16:10:00

Affair with the "Partizani" complex, Sali Berisha's lawyers abandon the session; the judge refuses to introduce the Constitutional Court

Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Affair with the "Partizani" complex, Sali Berisha's lawyers
Berisha's lawyers

Berisha's lawyers made several requests to the court, but judge Irena Gjoka rejected them. One of their main demands was to ask the Constitutional Court for an opinion on whether or not authorization from the Assembly is needed for the security measure against Berisha...

Sali Berisha's lawyers have abandoned the court session in charge of the former prime minister. At 2:30 p.m., the hearing for the confirmation of the security measure against Berisha, who is accused of corruption with the privatization of the former "Partizani" complex, began.

Berisha was represented in the session by lawyers Genc Gjokutaj and Sokol Mêngjesi. For more than 1 hour and a half, they argued with judge Irena Gjoka, claiming that the measure "obligation to appear" against Berisha is unconstitutional, since he has parliamentary immunity. 

It is also learned that Berisha's lawyers have made several requests to the court, but judge Irena Gjoka has rejected them. One of their main demands was to ask the Constitutional Court for an opinion on whether or not authorization from the Assembly is needed for the security measure against Berisha. But the court did not accept and they left the session as a sign of revolt.

" We submitted a request yesterday for the dismissal of judge Irena Gjoka and today we requested her to give us the audio material.

We have asked the Court to give us a copy of the acts. The court claims to have decided yesterday. Without familiarizing himself with the acts, he decided. We have asked the court to request an opinion from the Constitutional Court to decide on the legality of the security measure. He rejected this request. In this way we left.

The court is using instruments and excuses to not acquaint us with the acts. Don't ask me questions, you can ask them in Court (the lawyer answers the journalist's question).

You cannot ask me what the court can do. This law-breaking court, SPAK and GJKKO want to do what they want, let them continue with lawyers mainly ", said Genc Gjokutaj.

According to the sources, their departure did not interrupt the session. Judge Irena Gjoka has appointed a lawyer mainly to represent Berisha and it is expected whether the security measure will be confirmed or not.  

Regarding the SPAK file and the charges against Berisha, the prosecution states that the former prime minister has committed the criminal offense of "Passive corruption of high state officials or local elected officials", carried out in cooperation with the citizen JM, provided for by article 260 25 of the Criminal Code.

" In his capacity as Prime Minister of the Republic of Albania, concrete and active actions were taken, in the adoption of laws or by-laws, with the aim of adapting them according to the needs that were presented to the five well-known owner families, where the direct winner, among others, turned out to be the husband of his daughter, citizen JM On the part of citizen SB, in his capacity as Prime Minister of the Republic of Albania, active actions were carried out to carry out administrative controls, with the aim of exerting pressure and giving concrete orders, for the conclusion of the privatization procedures, in favor of, among others, the citizen JM, the husband of his daughter ", says SPAK.

Further, the prosecution declares that in his capacity as Prime Minister of the Republic of Albania, active actions were carried out in placing at the disposal of the citizen Jamarbër Malltezi, the husband of his daughter, various structures of the state administration for the realization of the process of privatization of the property. state.

" Irregular benefit in favor of the citizen JM, in the capacity of the husband of the Prime Minister's daughter, the citizen SB, there is a reasonable suspicion, based on evidence, that it is: Privatization of sports grounds and facilities, with the sole purpose of shot in the hand, changed destination and used for material benefits by citizen JM

The changes made in relation to the destination of the areas from sports to residential, which has led to the construction, from which the citizen JM has directly benefited

All the monetary benefits that the citizen JM received as an investor from the company "Homeplan" sh.pk, without investing in the latter, benefits received before he was declared as a spouse in this company, the profits accumulated over the years company as well as those distributed in the following, after 2018, calculated in total in the amount of 672 976 832 lek or 5 420 345 euros ", says SPAK.

Lini një Përgjigje