FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Lulzim Basha, who was expelled from the session after not vacating the floor of the Assembly, has stated that "there was an agreement between the parties that the DP was not given the right time".
He emphasized that in the Assembly "there was a claim that it was the end of a market", but he added that "actually the market begins". According to him, two investigative commissions will be established that do not serve the public interest at all.
"What did the public gain from 6 months of parliamentary revolution, but the public's interest has been seriously damaged. This Parliament, as it has been for a long time, had the opportunity to force transparency and one of them was the Investigative Commissions, but taking advantage of the headless revolution of the revolutionaries, Rama changed the law for Investigative Commissions.
Two of the 8 commissions they requested will be under the terms of a law that offers much less transparency.
There was an agreement between the parties that DP was not given adequate time to respond to the false allegations that were made.
There was a claim that it was the end of a market, but today, in fact, the market begins. It was the end of a transparent effort in front of Albanians to give Albanians what they want, not what the protagonists of this market want," said Basha.
Asked if "Do you feel yourself part of this bargain?", the head of the DP answered "Not at all".
We remind you that after 2 years, today is the deadline of this Commission and although the parties have publicly expressed the need for a new Electoral Reform that addresses the recommendations of the OSCE-ODIHR, their deeds speak differently.
The greatest attention to the operation of this Commission was taken by the quarrel within the Democratic Party about who would have the role of co-chairman. Enkelejd Alibeaj did not enjoy the support of the majority and the Re-establishment demanded that Oerd Bylykbashi take his place. However, in this request, the Democratic Party of Basha, although it did not have the majority, insisted that the right for the co-chairman belongs to them, not releasing pe. Focused on the request of the "chair", since the co-chairman enjoys the right of veto, Refoundation did not have a concrete proposal with points, clearly articulated on what changes they require in this Reform.
Lini një Përgjigje