
Fifi is not happy with the "DWTS" judges' evaluations of her performances so far.
During the daily trials, she talked with her partner Graciano, expressing that she does not understand the jury's assessment in terms, which is never translated into points.
Graciano: We will join together like a waltz. Even in the waltz, you were very good, you don't throw the whole choreography down for a deviation of the back.
Fifi: It jumped out at me. The choreography was rejected because they told me that you don't have a waltz stance. You had no waltz posture and I absolutely got a 5 and a 6 from the pros. In a waltz where the whole class was so big and got 38 points, I got 24.
Graciano: I can't tell you that you are wrong.
Fifi: This time I will not deal with the steps, I will deal with my posture. Because they are not looking at my legs, they are only looking at my posture and face. Because even when we did well, they only saw my face and arms, the steps I took correctly, 'bye bye'. So please bring me a cloth to put on his back because maybe we straighten up. I am very irritated and very hurt.
Graciano: You are very right, aman, I, as a professional, the posture you had and the posture of your hands and feet...
Fifi: Why did I even have tango? My tango with Enji's tango were two technically difficult dances, super accomplished, super so, super so and they were voted as they were voted. 34 points me, 34 points Anji. And to be voted a foxtrot and a waltz like that, to me it's… I don't know. Elegant, very beautiful, sit 10. While you super sexy, super sensual, sit 8. As if you are not waiting for me... Masandej they tell me 'we are waiting for you'. I'm sorry, but if you expect me, you shouldn't give me 6. You should motivate me, you don't motivate me with 5 points. Now I will do waltz and foxtrot and tango and bravo, sit down 5. How will we do it?!
On the other hand, Fifi blamed Graciano for the low points in the show. On the other hand, the dancer has returned that they are evaluated by a super professional jury who have no right to judge, but totally supports Fifi and they have the right to speak when they think their work is not appreciated.
Fifi: Now that you see I'm growing up, we should look for points.
Graciano: I'm not the type to talk a lot because at the end of the day we also have a super mega professional jury. Everyone is there for a reason and we have no right to judge them, but I scream loudly when your work in this case, mine or Luigino's is not appreciated enough.
I understand that it is difficult and you have to work hard all week and at the end they say very well and give you those points. But don't forget that you also have an audience behind you.
Fifi: The public eats what is served to them. If they say good and at the end 8, they say it is not for this job.
Graciano: Who says that?
Fifi: Now are we talking about the public? I'm not stupid.
Lini një Përgjigje