FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Since he is in detention, 1 day in the cell is equal to 1.5 days, so according to the calculations, the son of KLP member Nurihan Seiti will be free soon even though he took the life of a person no more away from 1 year ago.
The son of the member of the KLP, Nurihan, seems to be sentenced to only 18 months in prison, for the event of a year ago, which took the life of the engineer, Armando Meshau.
The latter was shot with a fist by 33-year-old Rei Meta and as a result he died, despite this and the fact that the prosecution requested 3.6 years in prison, the court was lenient with the young man and sentenced him to only 3 years in prison, in March of this year.
The prosecution charged him with "manslaughter by negligence", making the sentence low, although 55-year-old Armando Meshau is no longer alive today.
But as if this was not enough, the son of the KLP member, Nurihan Seiti (Meta), appealed the decision and as a result, the Appeal reduced the sentence to 18 months in prison.
Since he is in detention, 1 day in the cell is equal to 1.5 days, so according to the calculations, the son of KLP member Nurihan Seiti will be free soon even though he took the life of a person no more away from 1 year ago.
Notice of the Court of Appeal:
Referring to previous reports in the media, the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction informs the following:
The Court of First Instance of the General Jurisdiction of Vlorë has conducted a trial regarding the criminal case that belongs to the defendant with the initials R. M, accused of committing the criminal offense of "Manslaughter", provided for by Article 85 of the Criminal Code.
The alleged fact is related to the event that took place in the city of Vlora, where in the "Hajro Çakërri" neighborhood, on "Sulejman Delvina" Street, near the Court of First Instance of the General Jurisdiction Vlora, in the interior of the internet-chancellor "Number 1", as a result of a verbal and physical conflict, the defendant with initials R. M, punched the citizen with initials A. M, who died.
The Court of First Instance of the General Jurisdiction of Vlora, with decision no. 109/151, dated 20.03.2024 decided:
- The guilty plea of the defendant R. M, accused of committing the criminal offense "Murder by negligence", provided by Article 85 of the Criminal Code and his sentence of 3 (three) years of imprisonment.
- Pursuant to Article 406 of the Penal Code, the sentence was reduced by 1/3, and the defendant R. M was finally sentenced to 2 (two) years of imprisonment.
- The serving of the sentence for the defendant R. M should start from the day of his arrest on 07/08/2023 and the remainder of the sentence should be served in a regular security prison.
The case on appeal was examined on the basis of the appeal made by the defendant with the initials R. M, who requested:
1. The change of decision no. 109/151 dated 20.3.2024 of the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction Vlora.
2. The defendant's declaration of innocence, based on Article 388/1.e of the Criminal Code, because the fact was committed in the presence of a legitimate cause that is the necessary defense, and if the Court is not convinced of the innocence of the defendant.
3. In the alternative, the defendant's guilty plea and his punishment for the criminal offense of "Manslaughter", according to Article 85 of the Criminal Code, and he is sentenced to a fine.
Also, against this decision, the heirs of the victim of the deceased A. M have appealed, who have expressed that in relation to the legal definition of the criminal offense, this matter is within the competence of the court and the body of the procedure and we do not present claims. The victim's heirs have normalized their relations with each other and have no claims for the court's decisions, and civil disputes will be resolved with understanding with each other or through civil courts.
Prosecutor at the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction, Mr. Genti Xholi, during the trial, in the court session submitted that:
The position, the legal setting and the type of punishment is right and should be left in force, as far as the extent of the punishment is left to the evaluation of the court.
At the end of the trial, today on 10.06.2024, the Court of Appeal of the General Jurisdiction, composed of the panel with the Judicial Reporter Mrs. Diamela Goxha and member Mrs. Valdete Hoxha and Mr. Qemal Zaimi decided:
1. The enforcement of decision no. 151 dated 20.03.2024 of the Court of First Instance of the General Jurisdiction of Vlora regarding the legal definition of the criminal offense and the guilt of the defendant RM
2. Changing the decision regarding the amount of punishment by sentencing the defendant R. M to 2 years and 3 (three) months of imprisonment.
3. In application of Article 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1/3 of the sentence is reduced to the defendant, being ultimately sentenced to 18 (eighteen) months of imprisonment.
4. Rejection of the complaint submitted by the heirs of the victim for lack of legitimation.
Lini një Përgjigje