FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Criminalistics expert Ervin Karamuço, discussing whether members of the Constitutional Court were wiretapped by SPAK, said that the prosecution may have had clues from within the court.
According to the expert, there may have been someone at the Constitutional Court who may have passed on information to the prosecutor's office.
"There is one thing that has not been clarified and I think it is kept secret also because of the way the actions have been developed until the registration of a criminal proceeding. If this story had not been opened, we would not have been able to understand or even the prosecutors themselves would not have the kind of attitude that they have today, that you have to be careful when registering a criminal proceeding mainly. So where do you start, what evidence do you have? This needs to be documented, who do I have data from? From SHISH, from a member of the Criminal Investigation Department who will not file a report for colleagues but brings information. He documents this information, keeps it secret, but in the meantime he registers a proceeding mainly because he is among colleagues. And this second one I have the impression that has happened.
It is also expressed somewhere there that someone has been intimidated by someone else. And for this reason, let's say we are wiretapping the member of the Constitutional Court, not because he will do something illegal, but to see who enters this interaction and who intimidates him. In fact, at that time we discussed that a huge wave of blackmail began against some of the members of the Constitutional Court, even private things were taken out of them. At that time, this file was there. These things can be taken by the prosecution, it can be one of the indications that the prosecution has, why the members of the Constitutional Court are being blackmailed. It has the right to look with environmental surveillance , "said Karamuço.
Lini një Përgjigje