FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Trump seeks global control with his Peace Board
President Donald Trump has made no secret of his ambition to emerge as the most powerful figure in the world. In an interview with The New York Times last April, he declared that the only limit to his power is “my morality, my mind,” implying that no outside force can stop him but himself.
This belief in personal superiority is a recurring theme also commented on by journalists at The Atlantic, according to whom the last four years, with confrontations, indictments, a 34-count conviction, and assassination attempts, have made Trump feel invulnerable to the challenge that would often topple someone else.
Last week, Trump unveiled a new international structure in Davos, Switzerland, called the “Board of Peace,” which he said aims to promote stability, restore credible governance, and peace in conflict zones. The board’s members include prominent figures from international business and politics — including billionaires Steve Witkoff and Marc Rowan, his political advisers Jared Kushner and Marco Rubio, Robert Gabriel, World Bank chief Ajay Banga, and former British prime minister Tony Blair.
However, by analyzing the Board’s basic charter, it becomes clear that it is not simply a forum for peaceful discussions, but an instrument that legitimizes Trump’s idea that only he can lead global affairs according to his standards. The charter stipulates that Trump will be the first chairman of the Board and the representative of the United States, with exclusive authority to create, amend, or dissolve the Board’s sub-organizations as needed. Decisions will be made by a majority of the members, but they will have to be approved by the chairman, which in practice means that the world can vote, but Trump decides.
The Board’s founding document speaks of sustainable peace, “pragmatic judgment,” and the courage to abandon failed institutions. But unlike the United Nations, which has a specific, structured focus on addressing major peace and security challenges, the Peace Board makes no mention of Gaza, even though it was originally designed to help implement the U.S. reconstruction plan there. Instead, it defines itself as “an international organization that seeks to promote peace in areas threatened by conflict,” a much broader and vaguer formulation.
Several Western countries have expressed serious concerns that the board could challenge the role and legitimacy of the UN. French President Emmanuel Macron, for example, reacted on January 19 by warning that such a body with broad powers could violate the basic principles of the UN Charter. Trump has reportedly responded by threatening tariffs of up to 200% on French products such as wine, a clear example of how he uses economic tools to exert diplomatic pressure.
One diplomatic source described the Board of Peace as “Trump’s United Nations” that ignores the basic principles of international cooperation. While the League of Nations conceived by Woodrow Wilson after World War I aimed at a shared governance among member states, Trump’s Board legitimizes his desire to govern the world according to morality and personal decisions, with little regard for international balances.
The launch ceremony in Davos seemed like a media spectacle, with invitations to leaders and often controversial speeches — a kind of international “reality show” where diplomatic relations are replaced by the game of personal prestige. The Board’s statute also provides for the possibility of a country becoming a permanent member in exchange for a contribution of $1 billion, raising concerns that the role of powerful countries will be irreplaceable and unequal to smaller ones.
Essentially, this initiative reflects a new global importance that Trump wants to give himself, not just as the leader of the United States, but as a figure who sets the rules of the world game. While international cooperation and the traditional institutions that have maintained global peace and security for decades remain indispensable, projects like the Peace Board raise the fundamental question of what world order should look like in an era where a leader claims to run the world according to his own morality and personal mind. /Adapted from “Pamphlet” by “The Hill”
Mjaft u tallet me kete kllown.
Mos kini merak se Perandoria Amerikane ka mjeshtra në prapaskenë, që kur vjen momenti i tregojnë vendin edhe Trumpit, me impichment etj. Perandoritë e mëdha demokratike kur dikush tenton të bëhet autokrat apo "mbret", përfundojnë ose në luftë civile, ose ikën mbreti me hir a me pahir. Ju kujtoni se vendos Trumpi për gjithshka atje? Kur ishte Bideni kush vendoste? Bideni ishte si dement, e "merrnin për dore"! Trumpi do mabrojë mandaton dhe do ikë nëse humbet zgjedhjet. Sidoqoftë më shumë se dy mandate ai nuk i bën dot. Kurse Bordi i Paqes kur Trumpi mos të jetë më president nuk do ekzistojë më ose maksimumi do katandiset si bordi i autokratëve dhe diktatorëve, do jenë atje Putin, Lukashenko, ai komunisti Vitmnamit. Kur bie nga pushteti nuk të pjerdh më njeri.