FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Democratic leaders in Congress are demanding strategy and clarification from the Trump administration, but are not articulating a clear demand for an end to the conflict, as the war with Iran continues and the death toll rises.
Democratic Party leaders in Congress are demanding strategy and clarification from the Trump administration, but are not articulating a clear demand for an end to the conflict, as the war with Iran continues and the death toll rises.
The political debate in Washington over the war with Iran is taking an unusual turn. A significant portion of Democratic leaders in Congress are criticizing President Donald Trump's administration for lacking a clear strategy, while at the same time avoiding the most direct demand: an immediate end to the war.
The analysis published on March 13 by American journalist Adam Johnson highlights that many Democrats have chosen a procedural criticism of the administration. Instead of openly opposing the conflict, they are demanding more information, congressional hearings, and a detailed plan for the post-war phase.
Prominent Democratic Party figures such as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senator Cory Booker and several other lawmakers have stated that the Trump administration has not presented a strategy for the "day after" of the conflict. According to them, Congress should receive clear answers about the objectives and how the war can be ended.
However, critics argue that this focus on the “plan” avoids the core of the debate. Instead of discussing whether the war is just or should continue, political discourse is focusing on how it is being managed.
In this political climate, some Democratic lawmakers have called for congressional investigations and hearings into how the Trump administration has launched and is conducting military operations. Schumer stated that the American public needs to know the reasons and objectives of the war and demanded that administration officials testify before Congress.
But Johnson's analysis argues that this kind of response creates a form of political opposition that does not directly affect the conflict itself. By focusing on the process rather than the war, many Democratic politicians can criticize the administration without facing the most difficult political and strategic debates.
Public opinion polls in the United States show that a large portion of Americans oppose war with Iran and want it to end. However, according to the analysis, this stance is not always clearly reflected in the statements of key Democratic Party leaders.
The debate in Washington is thus taking place more about how the war is being waged than about the fundamental question: whether it should continue or stop. /The Intercept
Të gjithë derrat nj fecke kane.
Thonë kot nëpër debate që ka 2 Amerika, një e të majtëve (Sorosi), dhe një e të djathtëve. Në fakt ka vetëm një në prapaskenë që drejton këto të dyja kur bëjnë rrotacion. Kush janë? Kush drejton? Bankierët e $1. Ata që kanë vënë Zotin te 1$. Pra dmth për Amerikën, Zot është paraja. Kush e kontrollon paranë? Bankierët. Trumpi e të tjerët , të majtë e të djathtë janë kukulla të tyre. Dhe kur flitet për Izraelin janë të gjithë dakort atje. Një kuriozitet. Thuhet se në Iran një Bitcoin prodhohet me 1320$, më lirë se në vende të tjera, sepse atje energjia subvencionohet, por edhe vidhet. Shumica e Bitcoinit prodhojet ilegalisht. Kështu Irani kontrollonte rreth 7% të hashratit global të Bitcoinit. Pra Irani ishte një nga qëndrat më të mëdha të minimit të BTC në botë. Ky minim gjeneron miliarda $, të cilat vështirë se bllokohen nga sistemet bankare edhe pse Irani është nën sanksione. Pra, përveçse Irani kishte këtë fuqi monetare në crypto, ai me 7% të prodhimit mund të ndikojë tregun e criptovalutave. Të jetë kjo arsyeja pse Trump filloi luftën? Pse jo? Trump dihet që është mbështetës i cryptomonedhave, madje ai sapo erdhi në pushtet krijoi cripton e tij personale bashkë me të shoqen, dhe kanë fituar shumë para prej këtyre criptove.