FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
According to Rama, even if Ilir Beqaj stole and put millions in his pocket, the state still made a profit...
Bablok has once again been in the arms of Ilir Beqaj. Even though the former minister has been charged and is suspected of having stolen the sterilization concession, Edi Rama continues to oppose SPAK.
He appeared today in a conference with journalists and was asked if the sterilization contract will be reviewed, a contract that erodes millions. But Rama described SPAK's accusations as opinions and not as truth. On the other hand, he justified the thefts of his former minister.
" It is an opinion of the accusation, the opinions of the accusation are not enough to satisfy the government. Regarding the process, I do not comment. I believe that sterilization is one of the most important works in health and has brought about a change that cannot be denied by anyone in the circle of health professionals. The accounts and invoices are not up to me to do. We will do our discussions and analysis, but there is another analysis that was not done by me, but by someone who is a lady to account, and something came out that I became curious and asked for a second opinion and it came out the same. So the benefit of the state from sterilization is greater than all the puffs and it is really a great financial benefit because an average of two days of hospitalization have been saved, for individuals who have undergone surgical operations", said Rama, among other things .
So in short, even if Ilir Beqaj has stolen and pocketed millions, the state has made a profit and that is enough for Edi Rama.
Unlike all the other former ministers, where Rama has declared that they should stand up for themselves, with Beqaj the language looks much different. Rama boasts about the sterilization, while also seeming to justify the feats of Beqaj, who, thanks to Bablok's support, has thrown him twice. The first time, SPAK did not file any charges. The second time, he brought up a charge and left him in "obligation to appear".
Babloku also gave signals that he has no intention of releasing Olta Xhaçka, at least as far as the mandate is concerned. He was asked about the procrastination that the Assembly is doing to the issue of the mandate of the MP due to conflict of interest and he said that the decision given by the Constitutional Court is debatable.
" It does not appear to me that there is a clear and decisive decision of the Constitutional Court on this. The decision is of a different nature and not a final act. It's a question that needs to be asked, as I'm not clear ," he said. / Pamphlet
Lini një Përgjigje