FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
GJKKO will consider today the appeal of the "house arrest" measure for Sali Berisha...
As yesterday former Prime Minister Sali Berisha testified for the first time in SPAK, as a person under investigation for the issue of the privatization of the former Partizani complex, today a hearing will be held to appeal the 'house arrest' measure.
It was Berisha who, through his lawyers, appealed the decision of GJKKO dated December 30, which left him under house arrest, while he is seeking a milder measure.
We remind you that yesterday for about 2 hours former Prime Minister Sali Berisha testified before the prosecutors Arben Kraja and Enkelejda Millonai.
After leaving SPAK, Berisha told the media that he was the one who interrogated the prosecutors, while strongly attacking the Rama government and SPAK, as an institution dependent on the government.
When asked by the journalists, what were the questions asked by SPAK prosecutors, Berisha said that "it was not clear who asked more questions, they asked me or I asked them".
"Woe to them for repeating their fictions. They said that the law... where I showed them the law of 2004 and the article on expropriations. But they have hidden it.
Concrete questions: they had received a list of people, he knows these people. Where did they get the list from? I was asked what work Malltezi has done. They were out of procedure. You know about the arrival of that general. It has nothing to do with privatization. Why was the sports law changed? In 2007 it was given by concession, in 2008 it returned to the property law.
They asked me about securities, but I refrained from insulting them. That decision came out a month after 90% had been paid by the Begeja family. In the remaining 10%, the Begeja family had a total of 5%. Jamarbër Malltezi benefited a total of 64%. I am asked about sports, why the law was changed, 2007-08. The law of 2005 in accordance with the law of 2004. The privatization of the Partizani club was initiated by Fatos Nano, Blendi Klosi and Anastas Angjeli.
Rama is the person... if Berisha does not have any firm in the acquisition process, he has a number of firms. The accusation against me that I changed the destination to favor Malltez is the same as saying that I bought Rama to favor the groom. Rama has signed the change of destination, when it was state property. How is it possible that Rama signs the construction site permit and you don't dare to mention it. How is it possible that you ignore the name of Rama, when the court has condemned him.
When I mentioned Edi Rama there, they just didn't get under the table. And I asked them, how is it possible, what kind of beings are you, that Edi Rama has signed the privatization, the change of destination at a time when there was no regardless of the privatization, it was state property, Edi Rama passes the entire club in the area, signs the permit construction site, sign the construction permit and you deceive, you say that Basha signed it. "How is it possible that you ignore the name of Edi Rama, while the court has fined him because he did not disclose the permit until he found out that one of the beneficiaries was Jamarbër Malltezi," said Berisha.
It was prosecutors Arben Kraja and Enkeleda Millonai who asked Berisha questions yesterday. The latter has been under house arrest since December 30, 2023. We remember that at the time when the security measure "Compulsory appearance" was assigned to him, he never implemented it, describing the court's decision as unconstitutional. The former prime minister is accused of "passive corruption" related to the affair, for which his son-in-law Jamarbër Malltezi was also handcuffed. The latter is under investigation for money laundering.
Although for more than 3 weeks, Berisha is not allowed to leave his house, he has found a way to communicate with the Democrats. From the window of his apartment, he gives speeches every afternoon at 6:00 p.m., calling for protests against the government.
Sali Berisha and Jamarbë Malltezi have been charged for abuses with the privatization of properties in the former "Partizani" complex. The prosecution states that the former prime minister has committed the criminal offense of "Passive corruption of high state officials or local elected officials provided by article 260 and 25 of the Criminal Code."
While Malltezi is suspected of having committed the criminal offense of "Passive corruption of high state officials or local elected officials".
Lini një Përgjigje