FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
The former chief negotiator of the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue, Edita Tahiri, has shown where Albin Kurti was wrong about the situation in the north, which forced the internationals to oppose him.
Invited to Top Story, Tahiri said that the elections held in the municipalities of Kosovo, despite receiving international approval, Kurti violated the condition that the elections were technical and not political.
"Complete Kosovo without the north has no interest, the power of Kosovo is in the north. There are two strategic reasons that I cannot tell you. There are some geostrategic contexts that are not related either to Kosovo, nor to Serbia, nor to the Balkans, they are beyond. Albini's game to maintain the populist agenda in the north, Vučić used in a diabolical way, attracted the Serbian minority from the institutions of Serbia.
There were no border points in the north, I reached the agreement with which the borders were set. Vučić left it with a boycott. Kurti continued to have illusions about those who ran for mayor. America and the EU gave support because they were legal, but they turned out to be illegal, analysts often say why when the Americans supported the elections, what happened.
The Americans said let the elected presidents enter even under those conditions, but technically, not politically. To continue the work without a political manifestation, this was the first offense that Albini did to the Americans. Instead of saying sorry for making the technical introduction political, he hides things. This irritated the Americans and for the first time the punishments took place. In 1992, Kosovo sealed the alliance with America, when Bush came out with the policy of threatening Milosevic. If it wasn't for their support, we wouldn't have come to this day," said the former Prime Minister of Kosovo.
Tahiri said that Albin Kurti is wrong with his harsh language towards the third negotiating party between Kosovo and Serbia.
"From the negotiating point of view, if a state as a party complains to a third party that it is supporting the other party, it is a weakness. The state must have the ability to work with the third party, there are diplomatic ways when there are objections. This shows the smallness of the state, it has no ability to protect the dignity of the state. When you are a party, you must have integrity, not demands like a child. If the mediator supports Serbia, they have their own interests, the ability should be to return the interests of your country", said Edita Tahiri.
Lini një Përgjigje