FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Lawyer Genc Gjokutaj spoke about today's session of the preliminary trial at GJKKO against the leader of the DP, Sali Berisha, where the prosecution body read the claims against the chief democrat and member of the National Council of the DP, Jamarbër Malltezi for the 'Partizani' file.
The session was postponed to January 6, 2025, where Mr. Berisha's lawyers will present their defense before the court, where according to them there is neither evidence nor facts to prove the accusations of SPAK against the opposition leader.
According to Gjokutaj, all this is a farcical and marathon process, since the political motivation of this issue requires its duration to the limit to reach the goal for those who created this issue, the prime minister with all his power.
Gjokutaj also emphasized that today the prosecutor made a summary of the results of the preliminary investigation and it turned out to be a scenario that has nothing to do with evidence or evidence.
We asked the prosecutor not to extend himself into the waters and those that we knew, but we had as a request that what the prosecutor calls facts, he should have the purpose of clarifying what the criminal fact is in this particular case. The prosecutor has the duty to explain the criminal fact, the evidence and the circumstances that support it ', said Gjokutaj on "Syri Tv".
Meanwhile, according to the lawyer, the prosecutor should make a division of the evidence according to the persons since there cannot be individual responsibility and on the other hand there can be general evidence.
Gjokutaj: Today we were in one of the sessions of this process, both a farce and a marathon. This time, the political motivation of this issue requires its duration to the limit to reach the goal for those who created this issue, the prime minister with all his power. Of course, we have made every effort to ensure that this process proceeds within normal deadlines, within procedural deadlines, that the clarifications of decisions are within reasonable deadlines and as quickly as possible, as regards the restriction of freedom such as that of Mr. Berisha and Mr. Malltezi.
Today was one of the hearings, the hearing where the judicial review was opened after the recognition of a dozen papers because they are not procedural acts as they are worthless and forged, there are expert reports from unsworn experts and not communicated to us as parties.
Today, as the criminal procedure provides, the prosecutor makes a summary of the results of the preliminary investigation, and this happened and at the end of the session there was a debate about the way of conception, because the prosecutor, except for the poem as I have called it, after the they have memorized like a poem, a script that has no relation to either evidence or evidence.
We asked the prosecutor not to dwell on the waters and those that we knew, but we had as a request that what the prosecutor calls facts, he should have the purpose of clarifying what the criminal fact is in this particular case. The prosecutor has the duty to explain the criminal fact, the evidence and the circumstances that support it.
The question starts from the bottom, do we have harm or consequence. There cannot be a crime or a criminal offense without having a harm or a consequence and that is what we asked for. What is the consequence, who caused it, what are the actions that brought it if there is a consequence and the criminal fact together with the evidence.
And you know what the prosecutor did? He made his submission, what he thought, and in the end he said that the evidence was 'refuge', all for everyone, there was no separation of such and such a subject, Mr. Berisha is accused of this work and we have this evidence with which we support the accusation against his, the other subject Jamarbër Malltezi, etc. etc. that is, to make a division of the evidence according to persons since there cannot be individual responsibility and on the other hand there can be general evidence.
Lini një Përgjigje