
Journalist Enton Abilekaj spoke about the agreement between SP-PD, saying that it does not matter who wins from this agreement, but the public good.
He said that the parties themselves do not call it an agreement and this is an issue that confuses the public, while what is known is only the point of the investigative commissions.
According to Abilekaj, considering the fact that such agreements have been broken before, the opposition needs a guarantor for the respect of this agreement.
"It doesn't matter who wins and loses in this deal, but the public good. What bothers me is that you call it a deal. PD and SP do not call it an agreement, while all this leads us to a non-transparent process and the public loses here. We don't know who intervened, we only know some decisions that have been made for investigative commissions.
We don't even know who proposed these points and who introduced them, Nikola or as DP requests. We want to know why DP is returning to normality and who guarantees this normality. If the opposition comes back with these points and has no guarantor, someone must guarantee them. We have had agreements that were broken earlier between the parties. At whose expense is this agreement made? It is not known what would happen to the electoral reform super commission", said Abilekaj in an interview for Ora News.
Lini një Përgjigje