FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Journalist Klodiana Lala explained what happened during Ilir Meta's hearing at the GJKKO, where the former President was remanded in custody.
Lala said that Meta's defense claims that SPAK did not inform the court about investigative actions during the time Meta was held in custody and has requested a replacement measure.
"Mr. Meta for the first time after 8 months addressed the special court with a request for replacement of the measure, claiming that the court has not been informed by SPAK in these 8 months, for this reason he claimed that there is no evidence and facts. Mr. Cakrani spoke initially and gave arguments, claiming that there are no legal criteria for the former President to be held in prison. He also presented the decision of the Gëllci case in Strasbourg, where the Strasbourg court reasoned that prison measures should be proportional. There was a kind of tension during the confrontation between prosecutor Sotir Kllapi and Mr. Meta. The prosecution claimed that it had carried out investigative actions and that a credit card belonging to Ardian Shatku, a businessman, was also used by Mr. Meta and Kryemadhi. Meanwhile, Mr. Meta denies having any knowledge and says that he has never used this card for expenses and that he is not responsible for Kryemadhi.
Another argument about lobbying contracts in the US. Meta claims that there was no signature. The prosecution says that due to his position, he must have been aware and considers it a criminal charge against Mr. Meta. The court decided to leave the security measure of imprisonment in force. Mr. Cakrani must appeal and then there may be other requests. Mr. Cakrani said that Meta has never used the card and is not responsible for the actions of his ex-wife. Cakrani also spoke about a Greek lawyer, who said that he is attached to a former LSI exponent, who is now being supported by the SP. Let it be understood that it is about Mr. Braimllari , "declared Lala on the show "Të Paekspozuarit".
Lini një Përgjigje