FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Former prosecutor Elisabeta Imeraj, commenting on the case of the conviction of Alda Klos and her cleaner, said that it is interesting why the Prosecutor's Office has not revealed the source of her wealth.
She said that Klosi was punished precisely for hiding the wealth.
"This is related to the accusations, while for Klos I have the suppression that he was convicted for concealing wealth. It is interesting to understand that apart from hiding the wealth, how the source of the income of the convicted woman in question was justified and how the Prosecution came to the conclusion that we are facing only this criminal offense. As for the part why the cleaner was punished more, I believe it is related to the criminal offenses for which she is accused", said Imeraj.
While the journalist Mentor Kikia, said that the story started comic and ended as such where the thief of the thief is punished more.
"This story started with a comic story that the thief stole from a thief. In the case of the cleaning lady, she must be punished. There was a public opinion that said how well he has done, since we have an official who worked in the state and it is known what their salaries are, he had managed to produce many savings and just as he started on a comical note, it ended on a comical note that the thief who stole the thief is punished more," Kikia told News 24.
Lini një Përgjigje