FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Lawyer Genc Gjokutaj accuses SPAK prosecutors of delaying the arrests, giving the suspects the opportunity to destroy the evidence.
Gjokutaj stated that the fact that the court's decision was executed 2 months later led to the disappearance of the original contract for the corrupt sterilization concession, where tens of millions of euros were stolen from the Albanians.
" This decision taken in absentia, the court within 3 days, must open the session of verification of the execution of this decision that was given in the absence of persons, as an insurance measure. So to verify if they are the persons referred to in the decision, they are informed of their procedural rights.
The execution 2 months after the decision taken by the court, forced the latter in this case to open a hearing the next day to verify the execution.
During this time, the contract was acted upon, the evidence was destroyed.
When people are not brought under criminal responsibility and under appropriate security measures, this is what happens, there is a risk of flight, the law says, there is a risk of destruction of evidence, which is the disappearance of the contract.
The non-execution of the court's decision is the same as if the court did not make a decision, they canceled it, while the court is within the rules and procedural deadlines. The court has gone further in the function of a regular legal process, and the individualization of responsibilities according to the rank in the Ministry of Health, where it informs the prosecutors, this is an unprecedented case, this court draws the attention of the prosecutors. The judge has made a 380-page decision in which he argues the whole plot and in examining the elements and evidence, the court has concluded that there are other people on top of these who have gone for security measures, so he has drawn attention to being criminally responsible. Ilir Beqajn, and not to single out issues.
This is another scandal which adds to the troubles of this case, because even if Ilir Beqaj was separate, he should have joined this case because it is the same decision, it is his firms, etc., said Genc Gjokutaj on SYRI TV .
Lini një Përgjigje