FLASH
Shkruar nga Ylli Pata
As always happens: what you sow is what you reap, this method has now turned into a boomerang, where confrontation, not confrontation, is the key to victory.
The shooting of Cole Thomas Allen at the Hilton Hotel in Washington, DC, where the White House executive dome, headed by President Donald Trump, was located, is just one episode in a political violence that has engulfed the US since 2016.
When Trump unexpectedly won over Hillary Clinton, the situation was extremely heated, also due to the harsh language of the New York billionaire, and in particular his radical MAGA base that accused opponents of pedophilia and child kidnapping.
As soon as he left office at the end of his second term, Barack Obama, in a public speech, called on the Democratic base to calm down and accept Trump as their President.
But in reality, the majority of the American Democratic Party followed another line, which turned into a political strategy. They thought that encouraging and nurturing radical left and extremist groups could increase the Democratic voter base. A sentiment that had become a political weapon; delegitimizing the elected president.
An act and fact that began more than a decade and a half ago, when in 2000, Al Gore lost the presidency by a handful of Florida voters.
After the Florida count closed, Al Gore called the young Bush to congratulate him on his victory and then asked supporters to recognize the new president. This was not followed by most of the Democratic base, from which Barack Obama's victory in the 2008 election was forged.
Which instilled great hope in one political wing, especially the once discriminated part, where it was convinced that they could not only get two mandates, but even more, which brought the opposite effect, where every action always has its reaction or reaction.
The Republicans found Donald Trump with his crew of strategists, who went to the heart of all radical groups to turn them into a real political force, with an atomic bomb of political blindness, where accusations and slanders were compressed into the magical "monster" of social networks, which caused the massive intoxication of the political environment throughout the world, primarily factoring in the "Wild Horses" who turned political violence into an instrument.
As always happens: what you sow is what you reap, this method has now turned into a boomerang, where confrontation, not confrontation, is the key to victory.
This method spread like wildfire in Europe, where radical causes are bringing to the fore demagogue "saviors" who promise revolutions and miracles.
To calm and soothe this chaos, the political environment must await the evolution of extremists and the emergence of those who dare to enter the political battlefield with arguments and confrontation.
In this environment that affects and will always affect our "village", which takes and gives from this global world, from the good to every stupidity that is scrolled on the networks, the concern is that a dominance or expansion of political violence could endanger us even more.
The answer that some naturally have comes immediately in the form of a rhetorical question: More than that? Since the fall of communism, Albania has been savagely consumed by political violence, so much so that the pungent smell of gunpowder in 1997 in every Albanian populated center destroyed generations and horrified the world.
That trauma created a "social cushion" that pollsters call the "gray electorate," which until now, after 1997, has been a determinant in environmental depreciation.
But the pillow, as happens from time to time, can have its feathers removed, at first as a joke until the devils want to get out of the bottle. Currently, the devils of fear want to get into the bottle to be re-elected again...
Lini një Përgjigje