FLASH
Shkruar nga Dritan Hila
It impresses me that the Catholics accept it without any problem and even support it, and likewise the Orthodox see no danger.
It would be a topic that in a normal society there should not be debates. Western countries have solved this relationship between religion and state in time, although their coexistence has rarely been peaceful. The Catholic Church in Italy was in open competition with the Italian state.
Rome was conquered only ten years after the unification of Italy as the Catholic Church itself claimed authority over the Apennine peninsula. Until the pact between Mussolini and the Vatican, coexistence was resolved, but the friction over and under the rug has no end.
In France, the guillotine of the revolution worked like a sewing machine cutting off the heads of priests and burning monasteries, until the concordat between the state and the church was made.
In Spain, the republicans shot over ten thousand priests. Without going to the communists around the world.
But not only with the church. Other religions also had problems with the state, until they solved them or disappeared. For example, Shehulislami in Turkey.
But there comes a moment when modern societies need a peaceful coexistence and legal regulation and mutual respect. Rather, states have found cooperation with religious institutions as a way for regional and global influence. Such is the case of the chief grandmother of the Bektashis.
I don't want to get into the rants and raves of the mass of analysts who took the opportunity to grab the microphone, nor the researchers and philosophers who took the opportunity to reveal their knowledge. Not even the fanatical sovereignists who see dreams in the sun with the loss of sovereignty and creating causus beli for someone to attack us in the future.
Our independence was determined by a conference of ambassadors (even foreign ministers did not bother to meet) and we announced it when there was no one left without announcing it in the Balkans, so rest assured that the Bektashis will not sell Albania.
It impresses me that the Catholics accept it without any problem and even support it, and likewise the Orthodox see no danger. Only certain segments of Muslims were concerned. If they have it for competition, they should be comfortable as the Bektashis do not mess with anyone. If they have a problem not to sell the halal lands to the Jesuits, let them remember that the Albanians have given the extraterritoriality to Serbian monasteries and churches, so don't feel bad for a Bektashi building. They have Deçan there, let them go and get him.
The hint that this is an idea of the Israelis is also evil, they even give hugs to Baba Mondi with Jews (I don't know if they are fake or real?). Baba Mondi would embrace Buddha in the same way.
But to clarify, although I think that none of the opponents need clarification, since they are full of minds, there is nothing wrong or dangerous about this project.
Bektashism and especially its leaders are cooperative and open-minded. This sect now looks completely Albanian and accepted by other believers.
Other Shia are the Iranians and other centers of Islam in Arabia and Turkey, are being used politically by the leaders of these countries. It is not for nothing that Ayatollah Khomeini used to say that "if Islam is not politics, it is nothing".
Therefore, the idea of empowering the Bektashians does not spoil the work of anyone, even less the Albanians who will have a religion based in Tirana, a center which in the future will also serve for state goals.
And in order to create or strengthen a faith, to give it worldwide influence, you need an institution either spiritual or materialized in a dignified cult object and not somewhere in the former Poligrafik warehouses where you have to Google Map to find it.
Beyond the awkwardness of microphone grabbers, keyboard lions, or the awkwardness of jihadists, this is an idea that might make sense. Inshallah.
Lini një Përgjigje