TAGS-AT E JAVËS

Politike2025-06-12 15:31:00

After taking his fourth mandate, Rama declares "war" on justice; after the Constitutional Court, he also attacks the Tirana Court

Shkruar nga Pamfleti

After taking his fourth mandate, Rama declares "war" on justice; after

Tirana court dismisses Basha's lawsuit, Rama demands that judges be investigated...

Edi Rama's fourth term victory seems to be having its effects. With 3 terms, arrogance had reached its peak, while with the next victory it seems that Babloku sees himself as all-powerful.

Before the elections, he avoided the issue of justice, for fear that he would lose votes, but now Rama seems to have started an open war with the judiciary.

A day ago, he attacked judges who are demanding a salary increase and also torpedoed the Constitutional Court, which, in an earlier decision, accepted such a request. Today, the Constitutional Court harshly returned fire on the prime minister.

But it seems that the head of government has opened another war front. He has also attacked the Tirana Court. The latter issued a decision against him today, regarding a lawsuit that Rama had filed against Basha for defamation.

The court overthrew the head of the executive branch, and this has caused Rama to react with striking messages, clearly proving that in this mandate there will be a strong battle between the judiciary and the executive.

Rama has even gone so far as to ask the Supreme Court or the Supreme Court of Justice to take measures and put judges on filters.

Rama's full reaction

The Tirana Court of First Instance today dismissed my defamation lawsuit against Luli in 2018, for which the judge took seven years to conclude that, as the plaintiff, I "have not suffered any damage, since I currently hold the office of Prime Minister and the statements", therefore Luli's defamation "has not affected the public's perception of me"!!!

So according to the judge, Luli did not slander as long as his slander did not remove me from office!!!

Now that this reasoning has not come from a humorous book, but from a court and that the reasoning is not the author of "The Good Soldier Schweik", but a judge who is paid more than a teacher or a doctor from Albanian taxes, this is a fact to cry about and not at all to laugh about - when you then think that this judge belongs to the Union that is demanding a 700 Euro salary increase from the Constitutional Court, crying becomes lamentation! While if you then add to this satirical judicial event, the doubt about how people's rights can be put in the hands of such a judge, then you have to ask: Will the government of the Judiciary, with its senior advisors and inspectors and hundreds of its highly paid administration employees, wake up from their slumber to put the deeds and tragedies that ordinary people's rights face in courtrooms through the filter of high public responsibility?!

And let's be clear, the problem isn't what a judge did with a defamation case, especially when the defamers in question don't even take the laceless shoes I wear seriously :-)

The problem here is how to deal with the much more important issues of the people, which depend on the mind of the judge in question or others like her, whose logical level is below the capacity of a 12-year-old!!!

Lini një Përgjigje