FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Flojera Davidhi has been chosen by lot to judge the head of the Democratic Party, Sali Berisha for the "Partizani" file.
Davidhi completed her studies at the Magistrate's School in 2014. After a period of internship at the Court of Tirana, she was appointed a judge at the Court of Korça.
In October 2019, Davidhi was appointed for a 2-year period as a legal advisor to the Commission Support Unit at the High Judicial Council.
In May 2021, the Independent Qualification Commission unanimously decided to confirm Korça judge Flojera Davidhi.
No problems were identified either for the property or for the figure of the judge in question.
Regarding the property, the Commission has not found any problems in the taxing parts of judge Flojera Davidhi in two areas of agricultural land benefited by the family of origin in 1993 based on the "Land Law" in the village of Goricaj in Lushnja.
Likewise, the results of the administrative investigation for the taxing parts of the house built by the parents in 1986 and of a service unit in 2001, in the process of legalization, that were benefited through inheritance from the deceased father, have also resulted without problems.
KPK said that the subject of the revaluation has not passed the burden of proof for these assets and for two properties of the husband's parents, which were created before the marriage and the appointment of Davidhi as a judge
Regarding the figure as a judge, there was only a debate on a verdict of innocence given by Davidhi for a local official accused of taking 20 thousand lek (200 thousand old) bribes. The case was discovered by the hidden cameras of an investigative show. Davidhi declared the Mortgage official innocent.
The judgment made a stir in the media and was described as a rare decision, since the defendant herself asked to be punished, but the judge decided not to. When he was asked by the commissioners of Veting, why he acted like that, Davidhi answered:
"The court must be based on what is proven in the judicial process, that is, based on the evidence. I understand that there is a confusion, why the defendant herself requested punishment. She had performed actions not in accordance with her duty, but not in accordance with the criminal offense for which she was accused. It would not have been legal to punish someone, why did he accept the accusation, despite the fact that he did not commit elements of the criminal offense".
Judge Flojera Davidhi stated that she stood by the decision given by her. "There is an ethical violation, but the criminal offense must be proven beyond any reasonable doubt. In my opinion, the prosecution could not prove it. I gave justice," concluded Davidhi.
She emphasized that it would not have been legal to punish someone, why did she accept the charge, despite the fact that she did not commit elements of the criminal offense.
Her decision was later found to be right by the Appeal.
In Veting's investigation, it was established that she has good professional and organizational skills, that she has work ethics and personal skills.
In October 2022, the High Judicial Council appointed judge Fjorela Davidhi as part of the team of the Special Court against the Crime of Corruption. / Shqiptarja.com
Lini një Përgjigje