FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Davidhi is the judge who released Berisha from the security measure, removing his "house arrest", a decision that was appealed by SPAK, while the Appeals Court of Kosovo imposed the measure of "obligation to appear twice a month".
The GJKKO has postponed for the third time the decision regarding the fate of the 'Partizani' file for which SPAK has named former Prime Minister Sali Berisha, as well as his son-in-law, Jamarbër Malltezi, as defendants.
Judge Flojera Davidhi has postponed the hearing to January 31 at 9 a.m., while this is the third time that a decision has not been made on what will be done with the file, will it go to trial, will it be returned for further investigation or will it be closed.
Former Prime Minister Berisha's lawyers have requested the case to be closed, publicly declaring that the file cannot go to trial, as there are no facts or evidence. SPAK, on the other hand, has requested that the file go to trial.
And in fact, both on January 6 and January 20, Judge Davidhi has not yet made a decision on what to do. Perhaps the large volume of the file could be one of the reasons why the judge has decided to postpone the decision, although it seems a not very credible reason referring to the time that the judge herself decides to review the request.
Davidhi is the judge who released Berisha from the security measure, removing his "house arrest", a decision that was appealed by SPAK, while the Appeals Court of Kosovo imposed the measure of "obligation to appear twice a month".
In addition to Berisha and Malltezi, the defendants in this case are businessman Fatmir Bektashi, Xhimi Begeja and financier Andia Pustina.
SPAK's accusations
Sali Berisha, accused: For committing the criminal offense of "Passive corruption of high-ranking state officials or local elected officials", committed in collaboration, provided for by article 260 and 25 of the Criminal Code;
Jamarbër Malltezi, accused of committing the offenses of "Passive corruption of high-ranking state officials or local elected officials", provided for in articles 260 and 25 of the Criminal Code, as well as "Laundering of the proceeds of a criminal offense or criminal activity" committed in collaboration, provided for in article 287, paragraph two of the Criminal Code;
Fatmir Bektashi, accused of committing the criminal offenses "Active corruption of high-ranking state officials or local elected officials", provided for by Article 245 of the Criminal Code and "Laundering of the proceeds of a criminal offense or criminal activity" committed in collaboration, provided for by Article 287, paragraph two of the Criminal Code;
Xhimi Begeja, accused of committing the criminal offense "Laundering of proceeds of criminal offense or criminal activity", committed in collaboration, provided for by Article 287, paragraph two, of the Criminal Code;
Andia Pustina, accused of committing the criminal offense "Laundering of proceeds of criminal offense or criminal activity", committed in collaboration, while exercising a professional activity, provided for by Article 287, paragraph two, of the Criminal Code;
The legal entity, commercial company, Studio Pustina sh.pk, is accused of committing the criminal offense of “Laundering the proceeds of a criminal offense or criminal activity” while exercising a professional activity, as provided for in Article 287, paragraph two, of the Criminal Code;
The legal entity, the commercial company, Homeplan sh.pk, accused of committing the criminal offense "Laundering the proceeds of a criminal offense or criminal activity", provided for by Article 287, paragraph one, of the Criminal Code;
The legal entity, the commercial company, Kontakt sh.pk, is accused of committing the criminal offense "Laundering of the proceeds of a criminal offense or criminal activity", provided for by Article 287, paragraph one, of the Criminal Code.
Lini një Përgjigje