FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Former prosecutor Ervin Karanxha has stated that the Supreme Court has said after 15 years that the competent person to investigate the "January 21" event was Prosecutor General Ina Rama.
He told "MCN Live" that Ina Rama did not do her job then and was promoted today.
According to him, the person who destroyed "January 21" has been promoted today and is with the central vetting body that removed the others.
Karanxha added that the accusation was made by the Supreme Court, which says that the prosecutor general should investigate senior officials, raising questions about why she did not do her duty.
Regarding the appointment of Ina Rama as vetting judge, the former prosecutor stated that Lulzim Basha appointed her.
Karanxha said, among other things, that while we are talking today, Ina Rama owns a floor of a building on "Rruga e Kosovarëve" in Tirana and has not even undergone the vetting process.
"For the case of "January 21", it is a very big problem that the Supreme Court has said after 15 years that the competent person to investigate the event of "January 21" was the Prosecutor General Ina Rama. Ina Rama did not do her duty then and today she has been promoted.
The person who destroyed "January 21" has been promoted today and is at the central vetting body that has removed the others. What is the talk of destroying a file and being promoted. He destroyed the "Durrës-Kukës" case, which caused over 250 million euros in damage to the Albanian state, and he has been promoted again. The mistake that occurred is in the procedure for "January 21".
The Supreme Court says that senior officials, the minister and the Prime Minister of the time should have been investigated by Ina Rama, which was not investigated. The file should have been investigated by the General Prosecutor's Office. What procedural actions should have been taken? The records should have been taken, the role of the Minister of the Interior should have been verified. That the commander of the Guard is directly responsible to the Minister of the Interior.
They were not investigated at all. Why were they not investigated, what was the reason? The prosecutor has the duty to carry out the criminal prosecution. Sali Berisha could not be arrested without evidence. What evidence should be taken? The telephone records should have been taken, did he speak to the commander of the Guard or not? Because we cannot arrest people without evidence. He should have been asked.
The accusation was made by the Supreme Court, which says that the prosecutor general should have investigated the high-ranking officials. Why didn't she do her job? Why didn't she investigate them? To say that she called me "boulevard whore?" to say that she told me that and I didn't do my job. This prosecutor has brought the "Durrës-Kukës" case out of time. The value of the damage to the state was 250 million euros.
The case has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. And on “January 21” outside the deadline. Surprisingly, it is the same minister of the Berisha government. These are cases resolved by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court says that the “Durrës-Kukës” case has gone outside the investigation deadline by the prosecutor general’s office. It is decision no. 5 of 2009.
In "January 21", the Strasbourg Court said that senior officials should be investigated and the prosecutor general should take over the case, put a seal of prosecution on it and investigate senior officials because after 15 years they cannot be investigated. At least the people, their location, witnesses, telephone records, what they did should have been asked.
On the issue of "January 21", the Minister of Interior has not yet been asked! Why has he not been asked? After 15 years, you will ask him? And who has the authority to ask him. He has been avoided. Who appointed Ina Rama in the vetting that made her a judge? Lulzim Basha!
They did this and appointed her back to the vetting with Basha's signature. Do the vetting members go to the Laws Committee? They voted for her there. It's a political decision. This person who defended her here, voted for her here. How did you get her here? She got caught up in the phrase "boulevard whore" and didn't file the case. For a curse.
I had a conflict, Ina Rama removed me from the “January 21” case, she removed me, I was the prosecutor of the scene and she removed me. And for the “Durrës-Kukës” file, I am the prosecutor of the case. I know the case very well. It is not that I have it personally. There are two decisions of the Supreme Court that have ascertained them.
I take responsibility for what I say, which are court decisions. I was the prosecutor at the scene, I carried out the investigative actions, I seized the shell casings, I participated in the inspection of the fence, I also inspected a sign in front of the Constitutional Court. I know the scene very well even today. We did not have any obstacles.
Considering that it was never said that the "January 21" investigation was conducted by the Judicial Police Officers of the district police directorate. It was not conducted by the prosecution, the prosecutor participated, the prosecution was part of the group, but it was the State Police through the district police directorate that conducted the investigative actions.
When the incident happened, I was at home and saw the place where one of the victims fell from tree no. 2, the thick one of Hekuran Deda, and I went to record the place because later Artan Hoxha's video came out that shed light on the incident. At a crime scene, it is very important to record the place where the shells are, the shells that are related to the incident.
The other prosecutor, Adriatik Cama, has been to the bodies there and informed me that the victims' shells are 9 caliber. Every cartridge should be taken, but the 9 caliber cartridges are pistol cartridges, 9 mm Beretta. These were used from MP5 weapons, the weapons of the guards.
Rrethimi metalik ka pasur shenja predhash, për të cilat vendosi Gjykata e Lartë, predhat ishin me tendencë jashtë. Nga Gjykata e Lartë ishte lënë një detyrë të bëhej një akt ekspertimi që në dijeninë time nuk është bërë, arsyen nuk e di se më hoqën nga grupi.
Unë kam ndenjur rreth dy javë tek grupi, po grupit iu bë riformatim. Mua më kaluan te pjesa e protestuesve, ndërkohë që isha prokurori i vendngjarjes. U caktuan dy prokurorë të tjerë, Adriatrik Cama dhe një prokuror tjetër që kishte qenë te pjesa përballë Kryeministrisë. Unë jam marrë me protestuesit. Ishte një çështje që u nda në sektorë të ndryshëm.
Unë kam qenë te sektori protestuesve, kemi qenë tre prokurorë, unë Ols Dado dhe Bujar Hoxha. Ndërsa te sektori i vrasjeve janë marrë dy prokurorë të tjerë, prokurori Blerim Tomini dhe Adriatik Cami. Nga ky moment e mbas jam marrë me protestuesit.
Gjykata e Lartë tha se çështja nuk duhet të jetë te prokuroria e Tiranës se ne e kemi bërë punën qoftë me protestuesit. Ishte luftë gjeneralësh tashmë. Dimensioni politik dhe shtetëror. Në bazë të nenit 141 të Kushtetutës, sot SPAK-u e ka kompetencë që të hetojë zyrtarët e lartë. Por më përpara e kishte prokurori i përgjithshëm. Siç u çua dhe Fatmir Mediu.
Ka qenë prokurore Ina Rama që ka çuar Fatmir Mediun. Kjo çështje e “21 Janarit”, duhet t’i vejë numër procedimi prokurorinë e përgjithshme. Prokurori duhet të bëjë detyrën, të përgjigjet apo nuk të përgjigjet tjetri, qoftë Kryeministri, zëvendëskryeministri ti bëj tënden.
Nëse ata nuk binden, ti mbaj shënim që nuk e bëra detyrën për këto shkaqe. Por nuk ka justifikim të mos e fillosh punën fare. Se më shau para disa ditësh. Këtë punë ka politika. Intimidimi është pjesë dhe nuk mund të justifikohesh më shau “lavire bulevardi” dhe nuk bëra detyrën.
Komplot nuk është por është shkelje proceduriale. Dakordësi në kurriz të Kodit të Procedurës Penale dhe në kurriz të viktimave nuk duhet të ketë. Sepse sot ka arritur një pikë ku janë ndarë rolet. Shkojnë zyrtarët në 21 Janar dhe ndezin një qiri dhe do zbulohen autorët. Ju vjen shumë keq.
Nuk ke një vendim që qoftë ish-Kryeministri apo kushdo, të kesh një vendim se çfarë ka ndodhur. Ndërkohë që personi që ka bërë këtë shkelje proceduriale ti e ke promovuar vetë.
Në veting unë kam kërkuar përjashtimin e Ina Ramës për këtë shkak. I kam thënë ik se jemi në konflikt për çështjen “Durrës-Kukës” dhe “21 Janarit” se je përplasur këtu dhe këtu. Mendimi im është i bazuar në vendimet e Gjykatës së Lartë dhe praktikën.
Ky person që shkel ligjet promovohet dhe ecën dhe heq të tjerët nga puna. Ndërkohë sot që flasim vetë Ina Rama ka në pronësi një kat pallati te “Rruga e Kosovarëve” dhe as nuk i është nënshtruar vetingut, edhe te pronat.
Merret vendimi i Gjykatës së Lartë dhe thuhet pse nuk e hetove. Provat kanë ikur, njerëzit kanë vdekur, nuk do pyesim të vdekurit. Tabulatet kanë ikur. Çështja është nën hetim.
"If the order that Voice issued is true, an expert report will be made, the legal discussion will be taken as evidence, every piece of evidence will have a source, people must be asked about their positions. It must be seen whether the order is true or not, the procedural body must decide that the matter is under investigation," said Karanxha.
Lini një Përgjigje